Yeah, I'll die on the hill that we probably shouldn't be joking about violent retribution upon people who we think are wrong.

Decided upon by you?

Yes, let's beat people we don't agree with. Great idea.

Honest question: I recently commented on The Walking Dead review regarding a certain character's homosexuality being basically glossed over as a simple fact of who he is. I felt like it was pretty great that there was no need for a 'special episode' about the character's sexuality; that it's just something about the…

Oh, now we're down to a grade school level of interaction. Boy, the internet sure is fun and full of reasonable people.

That it's not a big deal, that it's just accepted that this is a part of who he is. There's no need for a crazy reveal or anything like that, he's just into dudes and that's cool, no questions asked.

Steve Ogg fuckin rules.

Isn't it rad that the biggest show on TV can just casually mention a character is gay and no one gives a shit? It's just like "cool" and then we move on.

Maybe you're thinking of Bill Hicks, who has been impersonating Alex Jones for quite a while now…

You have it backwards. Flop House rules, We Hate Movies drools.

Oh, thank you for proving my point. I don't really give a fuck about upvotes! Imagine that! I know I'm taking an unpopular stance, and I'm happy to discuss it with intelligent people (you're not one).

I don't think you know what "definition" means. Congratulations on being yet another asshat.

Did we hit peak cartoon-ery with Batman? Is there a series that's better overall?

No, THIS is Sparta: https://www.google.ca/url?s…

I'd rank Batman over Samurai Jack, but I don't think Batman ever quite hit the same notes that Jack did (speaking exclusively about visual storytelling…there are episodes of Jack in which there are maybe two lines of dialogue, I don't recall Batman pulling the same stunt, even when it relied on visuals; that said,…

I agree; I think it was more about being out of work than about racism or misogyny or any of the other awful things we can attribute to the pumpkin.

See, you're proving my point. Assuming that someone is racist because they voted for a racist is straight-up wrong. As I've said elsewhere, I'm not defending the pumpkin or those who voted for 'him,' but applying labels so cavalierly is the exact opposite of the point. Do you not see that labelling an entire group…

Is there a better 'Saturday morning' cartoon than this when it comes to visual storytelling? Please educate me if there is!

"Some of his supporters aren't racist; they're just racist-adjacent."

Oh I forgot all about the "Vote for me because I'm racist" ads! At no point have I said anything that supports/defends the pumpkin. I hate 'him' and everything 'he' is about. But you, and plenty of others (especially Barsanti) seem to be ignoring why people were okay with voting for a racist. There's a deeper…