@blyan: Cheers, and reciprocated respect. I get super annoyed when people just decide to ignore any valid points and/or default resort to insults. The internet becoming super mainstream has been a boon to intelligence, I believe. I won't say I'm a timber's fan, but my best friend's dad used to play for them, so I…

@BiggieShorty: Agreed, lots of hipsters in the Seattle/Portland area (I split my time between the two). They're snobby about their bikes, but they can't even get a properly sized one.

@ttk2: They come with an adapter for 3.5" (Retail version). Plus the reasoning below. It just makes sense from a manufacturing standpoint.

@blyan: I understand your point, but besides some posturing that we can make as a collective "audience" about the returns that Google (supposedly will eventually) regain by an experiment such as this, no one outside of the GLV team will have a good answer. I came across this link today, which might explain a little…

@SynthOno: Thank you for posting this. I haven't seen the movie, but this makes me ... almost... no, it doesn't. But i'm still glad I saw this.

@blyan: I'm definitely reading your responses. However, I don't think you are as "clear" a communicator as you think you are (all due respect, seriously).

@blyan: Sort of like driving a subaru in an environment that AWD isn't necessary? The point is there are people out there that benefit from the software, and that's the only point. Google isn't going to stop developing tools just because user X won't find it particularly useful ;)

@lhoulden: When their workers go "Out of Office," they don't come back.

@Possums: This clip is much more ridiculous than i remember it being... Granted, I saw it when I was a pretty little kid...

@sygyzy: Yeah, about 1/4 way through this article, I started to question if anyone really cares about this stuff... Just had to take a peek at the comments to see if anyone shared my sentiments ;)

@muzicman82: Yeah, this is exactly what I was thinking. This serves no useful purpose. Definitely not something you'd "lifehack"

@Missus Dinnie Dorito.: Definitely a good idea, just very difficult to execute :)

@Missus Dinnie Dorito.: Sorry, to add more: If the entire back was an antenna, and you touched it, you'd get an exaggerated death grip situation, you'd attenuate the antenna, and (likely) make it behave much worse.

@Missus Dinnie Dorito.: (No offense intended) — I think you missed the point of the split bumper. The reason they are separate is because they can't share one piece of metal. Furthermore, the antenna (phone) of the original iPhone "2G" was located beneath the plastic part.

@diasdiem: clapclap gif insert.

@mrsayao: It could, but it's changing your password isn't going to prevent a stack overflow. If the malicious code tries to gain super user access, then sure.

@snap_understeer_ftw: It's OVER 9000!!

@sam1am: I'm pointing out that there is a difference, and they shouldn't be used interchangeably. In this instance, it makes SOME sense either way you read it, but when you're writing semi-technical articles, it's a good thing to be precise.

@Adam Pash: I guess we have a different view of what -general- malware and viruses really do: annoy people. My impression of what you wrote was that virus/malware/"hackers" as you say target the largest attackable user base as possible, which in this case is NOT equivalent to "most CPUs," as it would be more…

CPUs != Computers.