Or their ass from a hole in the ground.

Who doesn’t know the fuck what they’re talking about.

You’re an idiot.

Fuck you.

Cones aren’t the issue. It is an unsigned worksite.

It would be in the driveway.

No, as someone who has had to sign road construction sites as a professional, they would not have. You know why? Because the MUTCD has rules about the signs that you need to put out - Road Work Ahead, One-Lane Road Ahead, Flagger Ahead, Be Prepared To Stop. It has rules about the distances which you need to set those…

EK Hatch > all other Civic bodystyles, except maybe the spacewagon.

In the same vein as No Man Reports His Own Death.

Jon-Erik Hexum’s obit might have a bit to say about how deadly blanks can be at close range, as they would be exploding in the face of someone.

I believe you’re looking for the 1993 Camry, good friend :P

Four more cones wouldn’t have done anything. Stopping a vehicle in the roadway for work has - as described in the article - requirements that are to be followed for signage. Not fucking cones. Even the half-assed subcontractor grade non-retro-reflective, non-MUTCD signs would have been a damn sight better and a sign…

Impeding the flow of traffic without a permit or following the law, as it were.

Sit down, shut up.

They are breaking the law. Stop playing dumb. Stopping a vehicle in a lane of traffic intentionally, performing work in the roadway, without proper signage or permitting, is breaking the law.

Don’t forget the other 2016 aberration: Trump wins, national outbreak of terrorclowns immediately ends.

Two months from now in Jalopnik headlines:

Someone more interesting than Jezza. If I needed a geriatric who whines incessantly, while living fine-and-dandy, I can visit family.

Like Leonard reviewing frozen pizzas.

I thought this was a Subaru Forester, from the profile view, at first. No, this is excess filth at its best.