Oh shit.
Oh shit.
You have cheap electricity.
What are you even arguing anymore? Rate of growth (acceleration) would be the derivative of the exponential, and sure that is linear. But the actual number of transistors is increasing exponentially. And the capability of the processor would scale with the number of transistors, since that encapsulates the number of…
Here from the same wikipedia you just linked to is the chart showing the linear growth rate year over year, there is no logarithmic axis.
Moore’s Law is about transistor density, not performance. Also, it’s two years, not 18 months. Also, doubling a square every two years is exponential, not linear. Your graph has a logarithmic Y axis.
Wrong. The electoral college worked as intended. You can’t let LA, NYC and Chicago decide the election for the entire country. If the tides were turned would your story be the same? My guess would be no.
You didn’t believe Trump could win? Not even remotely possible? You’re as hopelessly naive as the Democrats that are being written about in this article. I went into that night in a cold sweat, scared to death because it was obvious that Trump had a shot.
It’s not a dying generation. Once young people enter the real world they move closer to the center. Especially those who are successful. They have a better understanding of how the government works and get to see where there tax dollars go. Once you are successful, you see how well capitalism has worked for you and…
That’s not true. A good amount of Trump voters were Obama voters in the past two elections. Clinton was the cause of the apathy. She was the wrong candidate for 2016.
But that’s not true either. I saw it coming the second Hillary’s primary election strategy was “I’m not Trump.” Michael Moore did too. The problem, perhaps, is that the DNC has become too much of a Beltway echo chamber, and they need to start listening to their Democratic supporters in Middle America—they were…
Shit, someone should really let them know about the electoral college before elections.
She WAS a bad candidate. There is no other way to put it. She won by 3m votes. She won California by 4m votes.
Someone who only wins in cities is a bad candidate because that candidate will always lose.
So tired of the popular vote argument. It is such a red herring. It’s like arguing your team should have won the game because they had more passing yards.
Here’s how i see the immediate future of EV’s panning out...
uh... would you want your iPhone to be twice as thick?
Batteries have improved, it’s just that power consumption has far outpaced it.
Electric cars are the future of the past. The future of the future is wind-up cars, powered by giant clock springs built into the undercarriage of the car. Instead of taking several hours to charge your battery, it takes a matter of minutes to wind the spring with a large electric motor.