Maybe in the next episode of OITNB they can kill off Soso, and then show a scene of the ghost couple frolicking through the prison garden for all eternity!

This seems like a series that, no matter how well done it is, will inevitably earn screams of "just dumb feminist SJW propaganda" from a certain insecure subset of the male population. But whatever. I'm rooting for them to make a great adaptation, and I'm sure Moss and Wiley will knock it out of the park.

I think at this point it's pretty clear that if Naz actually did do it, it would be because he was off his rocker with the cocktail of drugs he was on, and there's no further ulterior motive to the action.

In the last 5 minutes of the finale, Naz is cutting his toenails in his jail cell and finds a message tattooed on the bottom of his left sole:

I think the main argument for Naz possibly doing it is that he was basically on a cocktail- from all the drugs he's never tried before to alcohol to his inhaler. But this isn't really positive evidence against him, just a possibility. The fact that he didn't have blood on him is a big piece of evidence against him…

Also the fact that Freddie was a "boxer turned criminal" reminded me a lot of Avon Barksdale.

I think a lot of the episode was purposely meant to have misleading sexual overtones (for eg. Naz in the shower), but Freddie is all about the business. Much more likely just a 'messing with his head' move.

And Laura Bush killed a guy! Doesn't get more extreme than that!

I think it's just a tongue-in-cheek reference— there was a stupid article on here the other day where Serial (or was it MaM?) was basically hailed as defining the true crime genre.

You Americans can give it but you can never take it. Unless you're taking a fat slice of cake amirite?

It seems like a tough sell now. But as they start retracing Nas's steps with the footage and everything and concurrently retrace the girl's history, they might be able to place someone she knew, and *who has a motive*, at the scene of the crime somehow.

At the end of the day, I think Kim's wild success makes a lot of people uncomfortable because it reflects society's thirst for utterly vapid bullshit. Kim K cannot be famous in a vacuum, especially because she's not exactly producing any artistic output that can be judged on its own merits. Nevertheless, I agree: 100…

In a sad twist of irony, logic was considered another demonic power that no God-fearing Salem woman should have.

White power bottom looking for now. No fats or fems or Muslims or Mexicans

100% of people who don't eat donuts die. Wake up, sheeple!

I disagree that the circumstances of Poussey's murder (and the fact that Bayley was the perpetrator) somehow makes her life not matter.

I mean, if we're taking the point of view that the show is about "educating white liberals about the black reality", killing off the fan favorite black character does tie into the theme by providing the most visceral emotional reaction. Maybe hamfisted from a writing standpoint, but it does the job of making something…

I agree, that's why I said it was damned if you do or don't— the first few gay characters that are written like regular, complex humans will inevitably get the "PC" label. I still wish they trusted the Trek brand enough to create truly new stories with diverse characters. I get why they're hedging their bets though.

That seems like a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" kind of situation, which happily resolves itself with consistent representation and good writing.

I vaguely recall earlier on the show that Jesse is testing out the limits of his power on Cassidy, and realizes the power can't make a person do something they wouldn't otherwise know how to do. (I think the 'failed' test was Cassidy not knowing the governor of Texas?)