dhyer
Dhyer
dhyer

Could you have given your number to the state when registering to vote? That would be my best guess for where they got it.

Out of curiosity, is that still common? Recent polls show that of all racial groups, the one that likes Sanders the most is African Americans (approx 70% approval for Sanders) and the one that likes him the least is Whites (approx 50%).

Democrats could have achieved many of those things in 2009 if they wanted to though. Instead we got a Republican healthcare plan, more warring and no jailed bankers. Republicans are extremely nasty, but letting Democrats off the hook doesn’t work out to society’s benefit either because it just means that when the

Literally the last VP that was chosen by the Democratic Party had a record that included being anti-choice, and he flipped his view in order to advance his career (except not really, because Kaine said he only believed in abortion “politically”).

This sounds more like after running through two rounds of improvements, FF 12 is far better than the initial version. Plenty of polish upgrades to mitigate some of the worst features and a completely reorganized method with jobs definitely could make a huge difference considering that I thought the initial game was

And they were all based off hand-drawn art, I believe (I have an art book with hand drawn versions of several backgrounds).

I don’t disagree with the endpoint of your analysis, but it’s pretty strange to claim that someone is flaunting something in a completely anonymous letter that couldn’t be traced back to him.

Rasmussen basically filters people out (only “likely voters” are considered, but won’t tell who they consider “likely voters” to be).

And yet, if you reapportioned all third party voters based on exit polls, it would have only flipped Michigan. Way too many commenters seem to be allergic to math on this site post on the number of times I’ve seen this.

I actually first learned this from a fantasy book, but it’s also in Bravely Second and the word is too cool and obscure to pass up: Glossolalia.

And I’m pointing out that both candidates records were shit. You seem to be ignoring that there are valid immigration-related reasons to prefer Bernie over Hillary. Granted, based on this interaction, you definitely seem like someone who ignores things that don’t fit neatly into your worldview (like say...calling

First off, I said Bernie won this district. The county isn’t relevant, because the county isn’t voting today. And yes, I’m right about that (so maybe check your facts first before complaining about being “lectured” to):

Was it better to support a candidate who played both sides of the Honduras conflict and then said that the children from that conflict shouldn’t be allowed to stay in America (which means they would be sent back to a very, very dangerous location) to “send a message?”

Based on the fact that he believes that basically saying “Jewish people are good at frying” makes one unable to critique “Death to all Jews”, stupid/ignorant sounds accurate enough.

Interesting. I’m wonder what a remake will entail. A whole new battle system (hopefully not)? More mechanics for the initial system? I’ll be interested to see because RH definitely had an interesting unique battle system, and I’d love to see them make it deeper.

Uber itself runs as a massive deficit (like their losses are almost as large their revenue), so I’m not surprised that it doesn’t pay often to be economically viable.

What you wrote has an implication that obviously many readers picked up on it even if you did not intend it that way. It’s like you picked a number range that went from -100 to 3; both the negative and the positive side have an extreme, but comparing upon them to 0, the extremes are completely incongruous that it

This two age groups can be reframed in a way where there’s definitely bigger split: Being a child when climate change is an amorphous concept and getting to live to adulthood before it blooms into worldwide-crisis versus being a child when climate change will soon have grave unalterable effects.

Remember when exit polls showed that if all the third party votes were re-allocated, Hillary would have still lost? Maybe look at the actual people that have structural power instead of punching at powerless people.