They ignored IM 3 completely. It's like it doesn't take place in that universe.

It would have certinly helped Warcraft, even if it was a repetition patern.

So, is he the opposite of Emilio Estevez?

That wasn't a flashback, brotha. You need to find a tangent.

There might still be some angles and points of view that haven't been filmed yet.

I don't understand the executives, suits, etc. They are supposed to be smart bussinessmen, they know a more talented director means more revenue.

My younger siblings and my old mother disliked Boyhood.

Except Batman. One well done Batman movie can surpass all MCU. Still, they are having their moment.

Even if the movie had turned good somehow, that would still have bothered me.

I'm still expecting a live action Joker representation of that animated one Hamill did. As much as I loved Ledger's and Nicholson's portrayals, I'm sure there will be another vision of the character whitout having ridiculous tatoos on him.

Unless you happen to be in the late 80's or early 90's. That's good advice for the time being, though.

Thank you Ignatiy, from the trailers it looked like it was going to be more style over substance. After the dissapointments of BvS and Warcraft, I still trust this site's judgment. I'm still expecting that Batfleck movie, though.

As it happened with the Legendary Black Beast of Aaaaarrrrrrggghhh.

And they won't mention it at all, "Oh Gallavant"

Late to the game, but still sad and understandable. Keep up the good work.

Now if only the story could be more or less consistent, we'd get some improvement.

And he may have done more killing that I wasn't even aware of.

Why did he not like sand?

See, they want to ignore that, just like every other previous president supporter. And he was granded a nobel prize…

You just granted me more time. Now if someone could summarize Atlas Shrugged…