@Feds: Ask any Quebecois, Acadians aren't French.

@sweetmonkey: Then I guess you're going to have to forego the utensils and eat it with your hands like the rest of us. We all have to make sacrifices for safety.

There's a million YouTube downloaders out there. How about a free app that will work with the myriad of flv-based free porn sites?

I think I might be alone in thinking that a couple of those are actually nicer than the stock Cayenne. I don't think very highly of the Cayenne, though, and most of these are even worse, but still, I think I might be an outlier here in that I would actually drive an RUF Dakara and be ok with it.

I don't know what's so funny about this thing. If there were any vehicle I would dragon, and any vehicle where the term would be appropriate, it would be this fine work of art.

@Otto-Mann: No, the Dinobots were the most awesome of the Transformers. Grimlock alone was more badass than anything Michael Bay could have dreamed up. But then, Michael Bay is a hack.

@badco/LoJ: Missed this comment thanks to the new commenting system. (It sucks.) Anyway, I replied to Murilee with a link about the 3 different 6.6L engines in the Firebirds of that era. The L78 400 and the Olds 403 got 6.6 Liter badging, while the W72 400 got T/A 6.6 badging.

@TexanIdiot25- needs a edit buton... EDIT: Needs...: There was a guy in Hot Rod's Pump Gas Drags a few years ago who put a Caddy big block in a Fox-body Mustang and fed it a ton of nitrous. It was stupid fast. Normally I frown on non-Ford engine swaps in Mustangs (cos they're usually 350's, BORING), but that was…

@Murilee Martin: I'm pretty sure it was 6.6. I found a website that says that the exact marking on the scoop was different depending on what was under the hood, but the L78 400 and the 403 apparently shared the same markings. Clicky

Pontiac also offered their own 400 engine in the Firebird/Trans Am up until 1980. Not all of the 6.6L badges meant Olds power.

@krooozn2009: No, this guy's car was blue. I did some googling and dug up a Popular Hot-Rodding article about it. If there's another Ford-powered Camaro driving around, though, I'd be interested to hear about it.

@brickyard: Yeah, I have no problems with the SBC. If your car came with one, then you get a free pass. But it's boring to go to a car show and see someone put all that effort into making a one-off, completely custom car and then they drop in a SBC crate motor with Edelbrock everything. BORING.

@JB_Finesse: I don't think so, but he does look like he's British. Not man enough for a 6000SUX, that's for sure.

@Deartháir - Now with more Age™!: I think they were always held back by the crappy 2v heads. They were crap, even on the Mustang, but it was at least cammed a bit better and the port sizes weren't so restrictive on a smaller motor. The 5.4 2v has similar problems to the 6.8 for a lot of the same reasons. If the 6.8…

@Timtoolman, now with power tools!: Second video. Like I said, commenting fail. I did a quick google search to get the right video and just grabbed the link that looked vaguely right in the search results. My second post has the right one.

@brickyard: Once, while surfing the googles, I stumbled across a guy who put a twin-turbo Ford 302 into a first-gen Camaro. Basically, he'd built the engine up before he had a car to put it in, and then got a great deal on a Camaro. He didn't want to have to spend even more money on a built engine for the Chevy, so he…

@Scott: No way, he's the most popular guy in his guild.

@brickyard: Honestly, I'm ok with any engine in any car as long as it's an interesting swap. That means no 350 Chevys in ANYTHING.

Oh lovely, hipster art. All he needs is to add some ironic captions and he can sell tons of t-shirts.

@despisethesun: Fucking commenting fail. Should have actually followed the link I googled. I meant, THIS ONE: