And did you hear, we aren't even supplying our military with bayonets anymore?!

oh man, I didn't even know it was a sequel. That's how little actual information is being communicated. I just thought it was the most awkward title on the planet.

I never said that, and that's not the point at all. The movie could revolve around anything—heck, the Best Man could be an alien impostor for all we know. The point is, if all they market is the same stupid photo of the cast and don't tell us anything about the plot, then the race of the cast, or any other major…

Actually I looked at it and said hey, yuppy white people movie about nothing. Or maybe five movies in one, because the one thing I could tell was that they were trying to tell multiple stories at once. But yes, it stands out to me what a movie appears to be entirely cast in one race, no matter which one it is. The…

I might consider it race-themed simply because I haven't seen anything advertising the actual plot. Therefor, I look at the posters, the title (exactly who is whose best man there? they all seem to be coupled up but nobody appears to be getting married) and all I see is "a movie about black couples." HOWEVER, that's a…

No argument here.

As far as the casting goes, I'm actually more concerned with whether he can pull off the oozing-sex attitude of Finnick than how technically perfect his body may or may not be. Sexy is a state of mind.

Well really anyone healthy is too fat to play Katniss, because Katniss's whole district is basically supposed to be starving. However, I'm super ok with not insisting on casting someone who starves themselves for the sake of that level of accuracy.

I had one who, on a six-hour flight, kept elbowing me. I was trying to sleep, so every single time she did it she woke me up and I visibly startled. She's say, "oh, sorry, sorry!" After about the fifth time in what turned out to be 40 minutes I replied, "no, if you were actually sorry, you would pay attention to where…

THIS. I actually prefer sitting by someone of a certain size, because they actually pay attention to how much space they take up.

hopefully someone else is out there binging "Google"

If she can prove a thing, it'll be a big verdict. But how does the one sane person on a team prove to the outside world that the rest of her team is behaving badly? Unless she took to carrying around a tape recorder, I have no idea how she proves this stuff.

I chose "credible thread of violence." Known rapists organizing and generating support seems like a credible thread of violence to me, because their continued existence is a credible threat of violence.

Maybe the solution is to stop asking stupid questions.

I'm really curious both how they phrased the question, and what other questions it was grouped with. I'm wondering if there was a survey methodology that led people to interpret the question as meaning as "ideal for health" vs. "ideal for socioeconomics." Of course they probably meant either/both, but subtle things…

Sad thing is, I'm remembering some weddings I've been to where the preacher's gone all Prop-8 and then talked about how the groom is Jesus and the bride has to obey… and he wouldn't have been that out of place there.

well shit. One more thing to hate them for I guess.

oh, I meant reporters, commentators, etc. blaming him. It's just getting him twice, no matter who it's coming from.

well, I bet that child-abandonment doesn't sit too well with them either, so likely there's some exceptions for situations like this, which is I expect what he was referring to when he said that whether he had to shun Katie was more complicated than they were making it out to be.

I didn't read the 48-page transcript, but based on the articles it sounded like it was about agreements made with Katie and Katie's wishes for her daughter's schedule in relation to those work commitments. When he's talking about it not being as simple as attending some event you're invited to, that rings true to me.…