Why would one teacher do this repeatedly for another, without asking what was going on? But on the other hand, why would she continue to do it if she did know what was going on?

EXACTLY what I came here to post. She's really only helping the state's case at this point...

yes. Plus based on my experience, small guys = great at oral. I've always figured that it was because they were working hard to compensate.

yeah, that's a bad time to be trying to make big changes in your habits, when you're that stressed and completely focused on your work. One of the things I learned attending AA meetings with my dad was to take it one step at a time—people would always tell newcomers not to try and quit smoking, or eat healthy, or any…

I've had the same issue—the men in my family are alcoholics, the women are sugar addicts. I know EXACTLY what you mean about eating less real food to make room for sugar, because I've had pints of ice cream for dinner more often than I'd care to admit. I've been off of sugar for a month now and while it's hard…

I never responded to guys without pictures either. Frankly, guys without pictures scared me a little. They could be trying to make a point about shallowness, OR they could not be who they say they are, or perhaps they're already in a relationship and don't want people they know seeing that they're trying to pick up…

have they done any studies on how much time guys spend on foreplay as the relationship goes on, so that we can compare and debate correlation and causation? Because you know, if we're studying sexual stereotypes, I'm pretty sure the two of those go hand in hand...

even more reason why they wouldn't dig any deeper. It just didn't matter enough to anyone.

because the sports news community loves it when players sacrifice everything for their love of the game, and that was the story they wanted to run so they had no reason to think any more about it?

agreed. I have to wonder if the guys who think sexual harassment is a big joke are partly encouraged in that view by people tossing hilarious numbers like that around. It makes it seem a little silly to me, anyway.

yeah, there's that aspect of it. I think that may be why I've always interpreted this advice more as, "Don't settle for a relationship where you feel like you love them more than they love you," which I think says more about a person's security in their relationship than it does about actual measurable levels of love.

do you think that finding a relationship where you love each other equally (or at least can't consistently say one loves the other more) is a possibility?

I expect the idea of mutual/reciprocal sexual experiences gets lost in the "omg my baby shouldn't be having sex! She shouldn't even think or know about sex! Wait, shhhh, if we don't talk about it then it doesn't exist. Lalalalalalalalalaaaaaaaaaa..."

ok, whatever. You are right about everything in the world, is that what you need to hear from me?

they're making fun of her because of an unhealthy physical condition. It's not a visual thing, but it's just another brand of bodysnark.

agreed, Jez is participating in a bit of body-snarking here.

I actually give her more points for the way she's handled the Charlie Sheen thing than for her work. She got herself out of it, and she doesn't spend all her time talking shit about him, which I imagine would be pretty easy to fall into doing. Rather she seems like she's trying to put it behind her in a more healthy…

I think the fact that the ticket sales haven't declined after opening weekend (the way they usually do) signifies that people that normally would have seen it opening weekend decided to postpone their moviegoing for some reason. Rape on Christmas seems like a very plausible reason—I sure didn't want to see it sitting…

most of those things, while arguments can be made about whether or not activism is necessary, make sense why someone might take issue with them. However I am totally in the dark with regards to "genital integrity"—care to enlighten me as to what you mean by that?

my thoughts as well. Also, if they were going in to steal painkillers, they would've waited til they saw her leave for work or something, and slipped in while she was away. Robbers strike when people aren't at home because people being home makes it more difficult and increases the chances their be identified and…