You are 100% entitled to your opinion.

I suppose that’s an option? But those laws are in place to protect the rights of the victims as well. I suppose he’d have to reach out to them and make sure it’s alright with them to share the details of the case.

awww shit it’s the APOLOGY POLICEEE

Pretty sure he did what he could given that he legally can’t comment on a case that was settled. But yea, sure, keep finding reasons to call him out for whatever.

I’ll take the bait. And how should he stop doing that, in your opinion? And based on his various decisions in the past 2 years?

Outed. Hey y’all. It’s me. I’m back. Listen, I just feel like the last year has been a really important and really hard time for everyone. Looking to the future, I’m hoping that everyone can learn from this and move forward in a healthy way. The abusers need to apologize and change. The abused can react in whatever…

How dare Brie Larson for being in a movie with known Woody Allen non-disowner Jude Law. She should be ashamed.

When does the healing start?

Why add the “or” part? It’s not an or situation. His statement said that he didn’t want the controversy that follows him to be a distraction from the performances of the actresses. He did the thing everyone was saying he should do. The right thing. But yea, use this as another opportunity to shit on the guy who has…

The third season should focus exclusively on the punk burglars in Chicago.

It’s super unfortunate, but I suspect you might be right. She definitely at least deserves the nomination. Ridley Scott and Speilberg do not deserve noms this year.

Should we maybe make a list of the #MeToo allegations that are legitimate and those which are problematic? I vote Franco falls into the latter category. Sorry everyone who was so excited for someone’s career to be over.

Oh man, absolutely. Also Seinfeld. And All in the Family. Total garbage.

How was it exploitation? Explain how this person who signed up of her own volition, agreed to, and completed a small part in a web series and was compensated for it, was exploited.

You going to write an article about this too? Or....?

It was for an Aol web series that barely anyone saw. Who knows what their budget for that was. Each episode was only 4 minutes long. She appeared in 8 of them. They weren’t making a movie. Barely even making a short film.

Yes but how is it exploitation? She had a part in a small web series Franco did for Aol, so whatever nudity was involved probably wasn’t nudity at all. I’m pretty sure Aol isn’t bankrolling web content that involves nudity. They also probably had a minuscule budget and had to do what they could with it.

This is the most ridiculous argument. She signed up to do work for him, and the work involved nudity. Was the nudity in the contract? Did she disagree with the nudity? Is there a problem with nudity in film? This wasn’t like some personal photography, she signed up to work on a film project and the film included…

Rife is thirsty.