Hell, she should take one step from the slope right into the announcers box and replace Bode Miller. She’d bring a lot more insight to NBC’s broadcasts and I’m guessing her left ski boot would have more personality than Bode too…
Hell, she should take one step from the slope right into the announcers box and replace Bode Miller. She’d bring a lot more insight to NBC’s broadcasts and I’m guessing her left ski boot would have more personality than Bode too…
Yes, thank you for pointing out there’s not an actual televised murder. It is very good this is not a snuff film. It is still a very shitty thing to do to to cause someone to think they are actually committing a murder. You can imagine that a person who ordinarily would not murder someone but who relents in the face…
You do realize that the Milgram experiments are taught in Psychology 100 classes, primarily because of its ethical implications dont you?
Notwithstanding, as someone else pointed out, whether or not the Milgram experiments would pass an ethics review today, the Milgram experiments were exactly THAT. Experiments performed by a trained psychologist for the purposes of studying the human condition.
Uh, the Milgram experiments might be a bad example, given that they too caused debates over ethics.
Right let’s see how many fucked up reality shows we can base on ethically murky psychological experiments. Maybe one could also be based on the schrodingers cat thought experiment, but it’s *your cat* who is either dead by dismemberment by a young budding serial killer or your loved one just put it to sleep for no…
Uh, the same Milgram experiments that wouldn’t pass any IRB today? No more damaging than that? Sure, sure. Good stuff.
He literally paid a bunch of actors to try and manipulate an innocent man into committing “murder,” Netflix made it into entertainment, and the tone of this article is what’s over the top?
You don’t see a difference between debunking a magic act and pushing someone to commit murder?
If he was “exposed” on the seance one, he did it in the first five minutes of the program when he states he doesn’t believe in that sort of thing but he’s going to use existing techniques to fool the participants.
So, because he does it regularly, she shouldn’t be horrified by it? Just because she hasn’t heard of this guy/his shtick before, she’s not allowed to be offended by the premise now that she has? I’m not sure what you’re getting at.
What do they win, except PTSD?
I don’t know shit about ice dancing but I would imagine it adds to challenge for the Shibutanis when they can’t rely on the tried and true “sexy” dancing / routines to “create characters” or “show connections”.
That’s one of the reasons I found the Shibs so refreshing—they weren’t hunching all over the place like coked up rabbits. It was elegant, classy, emotive ice dancing.
*Mind Blown
Yes. German Madrazo. However here are some key differences:
I met Irene Bedard (the voice of Pocahontas) a number of years ago at the National Powwow. I remember thinking that she was unbelievably beautiful, and that the movie would have been better with an accurate - albeit cartoon - representation of her than the windswept buckskin nonsense.
He definitely would’ve killed that grandmother if she didn’t do what he said. There’s a difference between him like, fighting the Dora, and him choking an elderly woman. Like one point doesn’t negate the other: Killmonger was abandoned during a shitty time, which led to some problematic, destructive ways, including…
In what way was his GF in his way? He was going to kill Klaue anyway. He also didn’t care if she lived or died. So the hostage nonsense makes no sense. She died because she dared to love and support him, that’s actually a closer parallel to real life than most of what happens in the movie. Choking a grandmother is ok…