The fact that it's packaged up in an MMS leads me to believe that it's something special (read: non-standard) that the iPhone does that will probably only work with other iPhones. The standard mass text message doesn't have this functionality.

Note: It also says "Click on next to continue" and then the button says "Forward"

Looks like a good application (Wine has always been too complicated for me), but WTF is this supposed to say? Lol

"it's not the cards that put people in debt, but the people themselves"

Vote: Weather.com

I don't think that's a limitation of Android. I think that's just how sms works. When someone sends a "group SMS," it's really just a convenience feature on their end. It just allows them to send the same thing to multiple people. On the receive end, you just get a text, and there's no indication that it was sent to…

Regarding the picture... why would anyone be calling multiple pizza places at once? Are you planning to have them compete for your business directly on the phone? Brilliant!

I just wish there was some more transparency. We don't know how it's calculating it, which sucks. If we knew, we could compensate ourselves when we know it's making a mistake (like your example). Since it doesn't tell you, you just have to blindly trust the number.

It's not the oil (I use grapeseed oil), it's the meat. It doesn't smoke until the meat goes on.

People who don't (or cant) have grills.

Because the article is more about assessing your debt, not getting out of it.

For Google Navigation, yes. That would be great.

Within the past month, I now actually owe less on my student loans than the principle. That was a fun milestone to hit (too bad I still owe about $60,000 on them)

"I've tried it both ways, debt-free is better"

Just pay your card off more often. If you're paying online it only takes about 30 seconds. You can do it once a week and your balance will never get that high.

I commented on this a while back when y'all had an article about Google improving their traffic algorithms or something like that...

Is there anyone out there who actually still uses AIM?

clicking doesn't actually take you to the source. just sayin'

You wouldn't need time to modify if you read the article before commenting on it

RTFA (or at least the second paragraph)