“You rang, Joe?”

We also would’ve accepted “Don’t Go Back to Rockville”.

Fucking over your employees and customers simultaneously is so goddamned American I want to go fuck a flag and make little America babies with it.

I was trying to figure out where south of DC that stadium was located

Sorry but no. There is no minimum age where Izzo’s unhinged lunacy becomes acceptable to do to someone else.

Is this where I come to laugh at another’s pain?

If you’re willing to trek out to Dulles, the Udvar-Hazy Center is nirvana for just gawking at planes and almost all things aeronautic. Plus they’ve got a space shuttle. 

The sad thing is that like a kicked dog, they’ll just go back for more of the same in 2020.

More broadly, GM as a corporation has failed who knows how many times. The government’s (AKA our) money would be better spent trying to manage the fall-out, supporting the workers (not the C-suite), sell off the useful parts,…

The more interesting question is what the NFL will do.

It doesn’t really matter. Those three are all pretty much the same thing at this point.

“I knew my days there were numbered.”

And that number was approximately 365 x 3, apparently.

Not all heroes wear capes.

Some of them wear ugly polo shirts on televised third-rate cooking competitions.

Nah. Minimal risk to him. He was on opiates. And apparently they did the trick, because no one, and I do emphasize no one, should read the shit that GREGGGGGG writes sober. It’s probably more hazardous to your health and general well-being than opioid addiction.

He’s white and kinda puffy?

All these comments have been pretty run-of-the-mill.

Yup. Maybe people are just getting tired of Scott Boras and his bullshit.

Yeah, if ON AVERAGE, $4mil/yr is getting boned, they can fuck me running for half of that.

It’s almost like the club took all that money and then didn’t reinvest it in the squad.

But then they would be at fault and that’s surely not correct. Every right-minded sports fan knows it’s always either the manager, or the players. Or both. But certainly never the front office or ownership.

Her arguments aren’t persuasive. She frequently has only a passing relationship with facts when trying to make points to support her arguments. What she does have are interesting policy ideas that need to be better articulated, using data, to explain both why they are needed and how they can realistically be…

Perhaps our intrepid author has an alternate yet unspoken definition of tomato can. (Trying to be charitable, here)