delmontefashionpeas
DelMonteFashionPeas
delmontefashionpeas

Considering all of our wars with a foreign power have occurred on a different land mass for the past 170 year, what is you plan if you want to assume you don't have the ability to use land or air as a means to transport equipment (since shore to ship missiles pale compares to SAM)? It beats the option of taking a

Donnelly said that investigators would re-examine the allegations to see if criminal charges are warranted.

He said there is no indication of criminal activity.

Can work, as one person mentioned above, they could have argued that he spent 40 some dollars on snacks and drinks rather than fuel. Not all transaction history will say what you bought, but only a price date and such.

The CC record is probably good but I always worry about a smaller operator complaining that he/she cannot locate THEIR records. If you give someone the opportunity to hide behind a stupid argument, sometimes they will.

Yeah I guess

This fucking stupid ass bitch had numerous "I should pull the fuck over moments." Fuck her (or him) for this. Their license should be revoked and they should face criminal charges.

Thoughtful input. Really contributes to the conversation.

NNop with two of her friends:

It was in a city so not many kids except those commuting from surrounding areas even had their own cars. Parents would buy E-Class wagons or more commonly Volvo wagons when their kids were toddlers and instead of selling them they would let the nannies drive them and later they would become the kids cars when they

Ah, to dream a dream. Have fun driving the family PT Cruiser!

That's funny because I went to an expensive private high school filled with the kids of some of the wealthiest people in the country but the parents all bought them a Prius or old Volvo. Just a different culture where I am, I suppose.

As much as I don't want to respond to this attention seeking crap, it needs to be known that you go to a "pubic" high school.

Thank you, its rare that a truck will be best at everything so I can understand how different companies take different approaches. It would be interesting to see how many 250's get out on rock crawling style terrain (what I assume is closest to the test chevy did) whereas the boxed frame F150 and its off-road

Pro-tip: This means it rides worse over rough terrain because it doesn't flex as much. So the ford is actually better from a comfort standpoint.

Ford doesn't have a fully boxed frame under their F-250 like the Chevy - so it's expected that the Ford's frame has less rigidity. That doesn't mean it isn't a worse truck or that it's weaker, but it isn't as rigid.

Strength isn't the same as rigidity.

A lot of people point out the hypocrisy of Ford here since their

Now playing

They need to bring back this particular pissing contest

"Basically, the flex is bad because you want you suspension to be taking the stress of a shifting surface... not the frame that's holding the whole truck together."

Damn. Those old Fords are still some fine looking trucks. I still miss mine.

Hey Ford...ditch that overly complicated pull out step and KISS like Chevy/GM did: