deleteme28934702
deleteme28934702
deleteme28934702

Then don’t give it to them. If they want to play, set it up in tabletop mode and give them the JoyCons seperately.

They have every reason to be bullish regarding the Switch. After all, it has party games enough to play til the cows come home. Plus it is gonna have those core Nintendo games like 3D Mario and Zelda so you can get your dairy game fix. The steaks have never been higher for Nintendo. I, for one, am over the moon with

I’m so tired of cynical video game fanboys and girls. It’s such a cliche now. If you think you’ve got it all figured out you should go to school and become a videogame creator or producer or whatever and make the changes you think should be made and stop bitching about how other people are screwing it all up. You have

Who cares if they get money from it? More power to them. Ain’t costing me a penny.

Who cares if they get money from it? More power to them. Ain’t costing me a penny.

Also confirmed: One translator is definitely fired.

He just imploded. I felt bad for the guy, but I was laughing my ass off.

What mistakes are you referring to?

My favorite way to quickly demonstrate the surround sound capabilities of my Sennheiser PC360D is to have someone load up Overwatch, go to the Training area with Pharah, and then have them shoot at something and then quickly do a 180 to hear the rocket explode behind them. It stuns everyone.

I’ve tried many different

B-T died for your sins

Ok enough of this. Stop assuming that everyone who sees Trump as a liability is automatically a Hillary supporter. It’s not true. It never was. I wanted Kasich or Rubio. I was given a total moron instead. I’d even rather deal with Pence (who I disagree with on social issues) or Hillary (who I disagree with on fiscal

I don’t really get this logic. All of these critiques apply just as strongly to Trump than to Clinton... some even more so. There’s this criticism of Clinton as a Wall-Street servant, but we had no reason to think that Trump wouldn’t have that same problem. He’s gone a step further, and has included actual Goldman

You spit facts, after facts, to back your shit up but here is one fact you fucking forgot to state - Your precious Trump, the one you are insisting on defending, does not believe in facts. So all your facts don’t mean anything. Until you get off your soap box that you’re using to defend the idiot we are about to have

Even granting all this, Trump is worse in all of those criteria. He is more hawkish (other than toward his daddy Russia), he’ll be far more friendly to Wall Street interests than Hillary would have, and is proposing massive tax cuts for the rich while slashing social programs for the rest of us.

That’s an extremely flawed statement. A choice involves 2 options, no matter how shitty, and one of them was better than the other. One of them doesn’t make us look like a bunch of fucking idiots to the rest of the world.

Wait ... do you think that President Trump won’t continue the “Wall Street-centric neo-liberal policies of the last 40 years”?

No one mentioned Clinton but you.

Can we please focus on the nightmare that is before us, thank you

I mean, the wealth gap had begun to narrow under Obama, albeit not nearly as quickly as progressives would like, but assuming she more or less stayed the course with Obama’s economic plans and team, I don’t see any reason to believe that things would have cratered economically.

“Lastly, I don’t think any person would have chosen Hillary as a paragon of virtue and human decency.”

I don’t know, man. After Nixon’s embarrassing resignation, the Republicans still controlled the Executive Branch for 14 of the next 20 years.

Their voters have proven that they’ll vote Republican no matter what valid criticism can be lobbed at the party. They just did this.