I don’t understand the fascination with this fight, it seems to have brought out the racists on both sides. 

He’s in a spot of trouble. If he had used the chair once, he might have been able to make a “self-defence” argument stick, but the repeated use, including the lady already on the ground ... that’s over the line.

Definitely a hot take. By your own admission, your tastes changed. That’s not reflective of anything other than your palette. Meanwhile, you know what you can almost certainly buy in most of the places you used to buy beer? The same beers you liked from the same breweries with the same level of hops you liked before.…

“After the Civil War, photographs of lynchings were published as postcards featuring racist text until it was banned by the United States Postal Service in 1908. That practice has been barbarically reincarnated as Black people being killed on video, with the footage being replayed on the internet.”

Hmm maybe I have an unpopular opinion. I feel like this is a common question asked of any race. Agreed that JG came off a bit snarky, but was that racially driven? As noted by the author: While the premise of the show revolves around conversations about “roots, patriotism, religion, and modern America’s…

“seems to have raised a lot more red flags than it lowered”

Doesn’t the first amendment only guard against government interference in speech? I’m pretty sure you’re allowed to voluntarily agree to limit your speech as part of the terms of a contract with a non-government party. It’s the same principle as NDAs.

Throw the book at everyone who went beyond defending that dock worker. Everone who attacked the old woman in the red dress who was trying to break it up. Chair guy who smashed her on the head for NO reason.

“Innocently” referring to a generic “they” who killed Jesus is like “innocently” tying Valerie Jarrett to Planet of the Apes.

Mind some else’s business? Did she read his diary or something? He wrote a public tweet that millions of people read. People are going to interpret that in different ways. It’s one of the dangers of tweeting.

A man hitting a woman in the head with a chair while she was lying on the ground was a step too far for me. Until then I thought they were getting everything they deserved.

“Don’t make me cunty. You wouldn’t like me when I’m cunty.”

Ricci Sergienko, an organizer at People’s City Council, a group that organizes against policing, told Jezebel the massive cultural reaction to the slide video stems in part from the obvious physical comedy. But it’s also funny because it took a children’s slide to deliver some form of karmic “justice” in a society…

Firstly I am not saying deadly force was in any way warranted (honestly sounds like he tried to run and they decided to shoot despite him at best being a minor danger (at most) to others on the road due to fleeing (bad reason to shoot someone)).

If it were strictly a strawman of the right would seemingly intelligent folks like the writers at Jezebel be straining the bounds of credulity trying to pretend biology doesn’t matter?

Alyssa, please consider taking down this article. This stuff about biological differences between men and women validates bigoted Republican talking points and sows doubt in the minds of Democratic voters.

Some, but not much and its efficacy is highly in doubt. Basically, you can strengthen the muscles around the joint to make it as stable as possible, but you can’t ever really eliminate the angle of the femur from the hip socket to the knee that makes women more prone to tearing an ACL. If you land wrong on a jump, or…

All about the Q-angle.

The Xenu biopic is finally happening!