It’s about the font. They are using the same font. It’s a fair call in terms of copyright but it’s sour grapes given how dodgy their business model really is, in fact.

same. it’s like “guys this isn’t original to either of you so maybe chill?”

this is what I was thinking too. Plus the fact is that in the US it’s incredibly hard to create a copyright for a specific fashion product. SHe changed the colors and sizes and the shirt design itself which changes the product. It’s a bit shady but is it illegal... no. Unless they have copyrighted the phrase “The…

Me neither really. Like I def appreciate the message of the shirt and what both of them are trying to do. Still meh though

Yeah, they did the same thing she did. The difference is they got permission and copyrighted it(so they claimed). However it’s still the same in my book.

The first thing I noticed is that I could get that rad shirt TWO WHOLE SIZES BIGGER THAN MY 3X SELF NEEDS IF I WANT TO!

It’s just a hollow attempt at being inclusive with no substance to back it up.

I know this is petty but the Delevingue version has more sizes available. The Otherworldly doesn't.

Yes, I’ve been and it. is. amazing.

They are both rip offs at those prices. Hit an Old Navy or JC Penneys get a blank shirt for a fraction of that price. Go to Michaels or Joanns (with their weekly coupon in hand) and get some iron on letters and make your own damn feminist shirt. Bonus, you get to choose your own font. (Iron on fonts come in all sorts…

I disagree. Lying to a child about their origins means there’s always a chance they’ll find out in an awful way from someone careless or malicious, or when grandma gets dementia or they get in a fight with their older sibling as a teen or a million other scenarios that can come up in any family. Or in this child’s…

Considering that the news media doxxed the grandmother, and also wrongly claimed some other dude was one shooter’s brother, it may very well be for her safety right now. I can absolutely see some nut job carrying a retaliatory attack out on the infant/family.

I hope this isn’t the case, but I wonder if there were initial concerns for the safety of the child - not from her relatives, but from others who are angry about what her parents did.

Why is the baby living with protective services at all? I thought usually emergency placements were with family members, when available, and the family member willing. I understand a social worker being in place while the adoption paperwork goes through, but it seems wrong for the baby girl to not be with her…

As a student, allowing someone else to access your student accounts is usually a violation of university policy. I would strongly recommend asking to see your son’s final grades, when he is with you, instead of using his account information. A large amount of student assignment submissions occur online, and your…

Oh man, I sat and bit my tongue (or fingers as it were) while a friend of a friend commented on her facebook post, basically saying that every single adult person should carry at all times and be ready to defend themselves. If I have a weapon loaded and ready to shoot, what on earth is there to stop my small children…

I think what really annoyed me in this episode was the way death was treated. You have the Doctor, so unwilling to take up arms against enemies in the past, shooting a seemingly decent, rational man who was on his side. Yes, the General regenerated (apparently not a big deal anymore!) but the Doctor basically shot an…

Hold up... I thought Lucas got bought out. She killed him? I mean, I didn’t like the prequels either, but that seems harsh, Carrie.