So it's for you then.
So it's for you then.
Okay.
okay
To be fair, the original had some weird alchemy of having Dan Ackroyd’s bizzare D&D campaign of a lore background as told by a bunch of guys who had some fun with it.
Yes.
Relax you drama queen.
Funny thing I noticed: when games like this come out, fans ignore the backstory in favor of headcanon where characters have fun slice-of-life relationships.
When Sega gonna make a game based off the Archie series? That's the only iteration of the character that has been consistently engaging.
I really love the design of just about everything in this movie. The gear is more compact while still looking like it was ramshackled together by a mad scientist, and the jumpsuits really stand out with those emergency stripes.
I’m just thrown off because it’s a play on a concept as the first iteration of a concept.
This seems like misstep.
Wow. That shirt’s really tame too.
I’m not talking what is plausible or what is possible.
I prefer the term flavor blasted.
A character’s reaction in a story isn’t based off of reality, it’s based off of what the writer wants.
So many that someone had to make a blog to prove it
I’ve been sour on Berserk since the eclipse when the writer decided to take his interesting female lead and then rape her into a submissive idiot to motivate the plot.
Utility.