Well now let's see about those attorney families affected by the trial:

Yep. Again, self-serving - and juvenile.

True! but like Darden corrected Clark, it all gets in to jurors via conjugal visits, which was probably worse.

I liked Clark's O Henry plot twist line too… O Henry, a NC writer, another colorful fugitive from justice who died in obscurity and awaits pardoning by Pres Obama.

Yes!…add Kardashian's reaction shot to OJ's reactions. Like "how is this guy [OJ] so lucky when he's so guilty… he just keeps getting breaks and makes it his story too"

Darden was sending a message to ALL the lawyers AND Judge Ito he did NOT want to be anywhere associated with allowing Fuhrman to testify. He did this in protest without risking contempt of court we saw earlier.

Yep. The whole case was like that: doing the right thing for the wrong reasons, and vice versa. Competence or ethics, seldom both at one time.

Probably. He never believed in OJ's innocence either. But his son OD'ed 10 years later, after a son needed his father, so I don't know how much redemption he felt.

Ha ha. Festival of pricks, hmm. Oh I've 'appreciated that piece of crapola' a looooonnng time. Ever since Marcia-Hair-Gate he didn't even care he couldn't cover for his hypocrisy that he agreed with the critics, and that he'd hook her up with media experts. HE didn't want a mistrial 'cause his 'constituents' wouldn't…

Settling centuries of scores in one verdict.

yeah, by default it sullies Judge Ito's credibility since it would be assumed his wife Peggy told him about her disciplinary action against Fuhrman - that she conveniently didn't disclose on the Conflict of Interests form. He should have recused or disclosed early on. It could be why he was WAY more lenient to the…

No, he's right. That's what Clark wanted, and he called her on it - her silence confirmed it. Anything else is on him. They ALL had their hands in the pockets of self-serving motives. Just like Garcetti not wanting a mistrial citing his "constituents" for re-election; Marcia and her 'stay the [losing] course' out of…

Yep. Off the reservation and into The Old Testament. Like a chosen anointed one who believes every bit of his own hype. And is floored when it doesn't fly.

I know that term gets thrown around a lot, but I think it was perfect and a long-time coming after being reduced to everyone else's bitch.

The purpose of THAT question, is to elicit the desired answer: to let the question itself hang in the air for the jury as a form of planted evidence without having to produce or prove it. It is a standard defense tactic, and is why they all jumped up to Cochran to go for it. The mere suggestion of what the question…

Holy crap for sure. Johnny aka Moses to the media was taken down a few pegs this episode. His expression: priceless.

Jerry Maguire is on now (OVTV) if you want to see…

…and what is funnier about that is OJ's Hertz commercials of him running thru an airport.

The mere asking of a question plants false 'evidence' in minds of jurors.

Little things to love:
• How I missed Greta van Susteren with her real face
• Robert Shapiro righteously lost his cool. Bravo
• Marcia retained primary custody of her boys, so she won something better.