I GAVE UP EXPLAINING AFTER A WHILE. IT GETS TIRESOME. AND I’M NOT SUPPOSED TO GET TIRED, SO THAT SHOULD GIVE YOU AN IDEA OF HOW TIRESOME IT ACTUALLY IS.

NO “TRANSYLVANIA TWIST”? WHAT HAPPENED TO IT?

1. DISAGREEING ABOUT A REASON DOES NOT MEAN IT DOES NOT EXIST.

NO. THIS MOVIE IS NOT GOOD. IT LOOKS GOOD, BUT THAT IS ALL.

OOPSIE.

I AGREE, AND I HAVE A HIGH TOLERANCE FOR GHOULISH. OR SO PEOPLE TELL ME.

MUST I BE THE ONE TO POINT OUT THAT YOUR HEADER PICTURE IS NOT THE *ORIGINAL* DOOM, BUT DOOM II? I GUESS SO.

UNDERRATED? INTERESTING CHOICE OF WORDS. I DO NOT THINK PEOPLE UNDERRATED WILLIAMS, RATHER, THEY BECAME SICK AND TIRED OF HIS DOING SHTICK AND MAKING BAD CHOICES IN SCRIPTS. THE SECOND HE BACKED OFF OF BOTH HE WAS APPRECIATED AGAIN.

HAS A REAL “WITCHER 3" LOOK TO IT.

I PLAYED TORB WITH REGULARITY. GRANTED, WITH MY SKILLS, HE WAS LIMITED TO CERTAIN MAPS AND SITUATIONS, BUT I GAVE A GOOD ACCOUNTING OF MYSELF ON THOSE. I WILL ADMIT TO FEELING GUILTY ON THOSE FEW OCCASIONS I GOT “PLAY OF THE GAME”, AND IT WAS ENTIRELY DUE TO MY TURRET. THE VIDEO WOULD BE OF ME WALKING DOWN SOME…

THIS DOESN’T REALLY WORK FOR ME. ONE OF THE ADVANTAGES OF NOT HAVING FLESH, I SUPPOSE.

GOOD USERNAME-COMMENT SYNERGY.

SOMETIMES A STYLE SHIFT CAN CREATE INTERESTING NEW WAYS AT LOOKING AT A PIECE OF MUSIC. THIS IS NOT ONE OF THOSE TIMES.

CORRECT, DR. IF THE DUST GOES, THERE WON’T BE A SAFE PLACE.

COAL BURNS, BUT DOES NOT EXPLODE. MOST CANNON STILL USED SOLID SHOT, AND A LARGE PILE OF COAL WAS AS GOOD A PLACE TO HIDE BEHIND AS ANY.

NO. I DO OWN, HOWEVER.

CIGARETTE MAKES A SALIENT POINT. IT MUST BE NOTED THAT, UP UNTIL PERHAPS 1950, PRINT JOURNALISM IN AMERICA WAS VERY VERY PARTISAN. THERE WERE DEMOCRATIC, REPUBLICAN, SOCIALIST, AND EVERY OTHER -IST, -IC, AND -AN PUBLICATION YOU COULD IMAGINE. RADIO WAS FILLED WITH THE LIKES OF FATHER COUGHLIN (THINK A CATHOLIC RUSH…

FUN FACT: THE TRAINS DID NOT ACTUALLY RUN ON TIME.

I WOULD VERY MUCH LIKE TO PLAY THE KING GEORGE PART IN A PRODUCTION OF HAMILTON. IT WOULD BE HUGE FUN.

THE DEBATES AND ARGUMENTS BETWEEN THE “PROGRESSIVE” AND “CONSERVATIVE” RELIGIOUS ARE EASY TO FIND FOR THOSE WHO CHOOSE TO LOOK. THEY ARE, LIKE MOST COMPLEX ISSUES, POORLY COVERED BY THE GENERAL MEDIA.