I’m sorry, but the forefathers would NEVER deign to acknowledge the authority of a COLORED man! Therefore, neither Thomas nor Alito (what with his swarthy Italian blood!) should be recognized. This also means they will not bother to acknowledge Coney Barrett, Kagan, Sotomayor, or Brown Jackson. This Supreme Court…

If demanding resignations wouldn’t work, what do you suggest they do?

That seems to be a general theme of the blue lives matter movement. They should also really be pro gun control since fewer guns in private citizens’ hands would be less for cops to worry about. Or pro lowering speed limits etc. But they’re focused more on aiding the worst kind of cop

They'd rather retain their ability to murder their partners than keep themselves safe. 

What makes you think demanding resignations would work?

I mean, if the founding fathers gave us the right to nuclear weapons in the Constitution, government regulation of nuclear weapons would be constrained by the right.

I’m right there with you. And I don’t believe this particular person for a second that he “no longer wants to own guns”. 

The Founding Fathers never addressed space travel, nuclear weapons or cars, yet the federal government has zero program regulating all those things.

Bingo. With The Nine, it is all about coming before the court with the precisely *right* question to which the majority will answer in the affirmative or negative to induce their desired result, altering reality for us all.

So much of our government is based on gentlemen’s agreements that it’s surprising it’s taken them this long to realize nothing is actually compelling them to act like gentlemen.

If you make threats like that, they will definitely take your plague guns.

From this information I think we can safely discern that Harlan Crow is in favor of letting abusers have their guns.

what you’re describing is a well known aspect of American legal realism; namely, that judges decide how they will judge on a given case before exploring historical analogs or other sorts of legal documentation. the judges then pick and choose those historical cases that support their interpretation of the current case…

Dude if the founding fathers had their way a Catholic and a black man would *not* be in any position of power at all 

You’d think blue lives matter would be upset with this considering domestic violence related shootings are one of the main ways cops get shot... though of course plenty of them are abusers themselves

Alito, Thomas and the rest of the feudal Justices should die of consumption or cholera just as the forefathers intended.

For many years now, I’ve been of the mindset that SCOTUS Justices rule upon, and construct their opinions, by working backwards from the results they desire based on their personal politics. I’ve long thought they basically invent the road in front of themselves while pretending it was always there.

“February 2020 after a 2019 incident in which he dragged her by her hair into his car in front of their child. Then he shot at 5 people in different incidents.”

Listen, it’s okay that people who have a verifiable track record of abusing partners have access to weapons that make it easier to abuse them even more, because people in the 18th Century totally thought that domestic abuse was a thing. Totally!

What has Charles ever done that's considered "work?" Being a welfare mooch isn't a real job.