@ara: it could, though, determine the difference of the bandwidth of frequencies a colour uses. consider red: 635 nm. if it's a laser shooting it, it's only that frequency. if it's from some reflected paint, it might be a mix of 600 nm to 670 nm. to the eye, this will look (nearly) identical. to a camera having a…

why not 'those 4 minutes' every morning. could be healty, too..?

@FriedPeeps: doing this with my windows home server. next version will provide more features towards this.

@cc: because it will be all over the geek blogs and we'll fight about it because we love one or the other, and the result will be much more free advertisings.

Disabling for removing the Items in the Explorer view, yes. For saving system resources? No. Not that anyone would ever notice any difference.

@Ian Logsdon: just, like, better.. :)

@Hello Mister Walrus: +1, want to read them, too :)

@Ian Logsdon: a friend was there but couldn't get me in. he said it was absolutely unbelievable and really awesome.

@wætherman: he tries in america, the country that does pre-emtive strikes based on lies. so he COULD get support, if he does it right :)

@kitsuneconundrum: it's a fully integrated system on a chip (how hard am i really to read?!).

@kitsuneconundrum: uhm no? their next cpu IS cpu+gpu. it's one chip. there is no "graphics card", no part you could call ati on it's own.

@Matthew Lucas: i use the web where i gain from it. having APPS there does not gain me anything. local offline apps that connect to online services give me, the user, more control., more flexibity, more rights.

@Matthew Lucas: mail is an app+service, and i care about the service. but i don't care if it's a webapp in the cloud, or a desktop app. in my case, it's gmail = a webapp.

@tmlfan81: why should i WANT to move to the cloud? there's no gain from it. it's mostly just sell stuff that couldn't be sold before.

I'll miss it. It's for me the biggest technological step forward i've seen in years (not the web-app per se, but the Wave technology itself)

@kitsuneconundrum: they develop cpu+gpu on a chip systems. would they have to call them AMDATI or ATIAMD or what, then?

@Nitemancometh: problem is, they will produce much merged products, with gpu and cpu on one die.

@Matthew Lucas: what ever those "complete transitions from the desktop to the web" should bring to us. "sorry, teacher, my homework server is offline". "i only lost because my browser did hick up". etc.

@DeLarge: it's.. water + dry..

i want one in the design of soundcloud and put my cd's on it.