You say this as though socialists would care that someone didn’t have a job until their 40's. Why would a politician’s prior job experience matter if he’s advocating for policies that people support?

Ah yes, listing all kinds of insurance that aren’t health insurance really help your argument.

The party that thinks calling people BIGOT on facebookor sending Planned Parenthood donations in Pence’s name is fucking activism. 

That’s because Sander’s rape erotica from 30 years ago didn’t result in a fucking senile, narcissist, sexist, racist, xenophobe as President of the United States. HRC’s failures in 2016 did that.

If only the DNC had chosen a candidate that appealed to enough voters to motivate them to vote.

Do you prefer Libya or Honduras?

I’d argue Obama could’ve used a term or two in the senate to build relationships/help understand the reality of how the legislative branch functions.

All those professionals you listed above have reason to exist across industries. You, on the other hand, are a leech on society. How does it feel to know there’ll be a giant party when we finally rid the country of your “industry”.

So 10-12% of Bernie supporters went Trump and that is easily enough in the 3 key states to have handed it to Trump.

You’re a real piece of shit.

I’m sure you’ll be along swiftly to explain why journalists are totally 100% okay with taking dictation from their ownership and there’s no division between editorial and business and also journalists aren’t the kind of assholes to be real specific about these sorts of things.

Your life’s work only exists because of a broken system.

I have a lot of memories built around this guy :

Is he attempting irony?

These are significantly less complex than sets I was building when I was 6-12. Do they purposefully dumb down the “Friends” line under some BS idea like girls don’t like to build?

Rugby with forward passes ideally.

Take away pads and helmets and all of a sudden you don’t have lineman and defenders using their heads as a weapon for 100 plays a game (plus how ever many thousand times you get your bell rung at practice over the years).

Gladwell’s full of shit. Look into any episode of Revisionist History and you’ll find his assumptions faulty and that his research process is dedicated solely toward proving his hypothesis; in that he throws away anything that’s counter to his chosen narrative.

Women named (((Rebecca))) typically have too much influence in banking and the media to appeal to the 1488 crowd.

17 is a lot now?