Slut-shaming has become shorthand for revealing a woman’s sexual life, if it’s beyond missionary-position with her only sex partner. In 2016, it’s semantically broken

In any case, they’ll need some more admissible evidence to move forward in the first place. It’s not unreasonable to think that they might turn up a cell phone pic or something that wasn’t already disclosed.

Necessary, probably not, but as a matter of course, the strategy is to present all possible reasons your client is not guilty/not liable, not just the most likely. Anything less and you aren’t zealously representing your client.

Side note - as a matter of decorum, why would the judge say anything like “best wishes, except when the Knicks play the Lakers”. I might be meaningless banter in reality, but it can only look bad.

but hold on - what was she wearing?? V. important to know before making a judgement here.

Have you listened to Dave Chappelle’s bit on trying to show his nephew “safe” TV by showing them old cartoons?

I think, being totally mortified and paralyzed by shock cuts across all genders. I’m a guy, but I can only imagine my initial, in-the-moment reaction would be “what the fuck just happened? did that really just happen?” before I had the thought to be angry.

I guess. My feeling is that, after being treated like Doe was, anyone would feel “scorned”.

huh? If you are going to accuse someone of mind-reading from afar, start with yourself, eh? I don’t know any better than you what happened, I just offered my opinion based on what i’ve read about the case and my own experience. I don’t know if I’ve implied anything about Doe’s character or sexual appetites to imply…

My take is that Rose understood this dynamic (that she was more into him than her). On an ethical level, it’s inappropriate to continue with someone under this scenario. I don’t think it makes him liable, or a criminal - it just makes him a scuzzy, inconsiderate dirtbag. Just because there are 1,000 women out there…

Yeah - I have a friend who can be blackout drunk but has appeared to me as stone-cold sober. There’s also the fact that basically 95% of Americans of all sexes have used alcohol to make meeting/hooking up easier (there is an entire trillion dollar industry supporting this) and have hooked up with people who were too…

I mean, treated her like crap on the night in question, not subsequently. It seems he was stringing her along for quite a while

Taking the Hunt is a commandment for sure.

IMO, brawl has been way less toxic than any other mode. no MMR to worry about, no rank, just pure, blessed killing. The 10-of matches are especially fun.

Brawl won’t be my primary play-style, but I believe it’s a better playstyle - while HL is stressful, worrying about your MMR and such, about your 30 minute time commitment where you can’t even hit pause to grab something from the microwave, etc, really encourages a lot of shitty behavior aka saltiness. I found that in…

I think it was inbetween. I’m sure Doe was under the influence of alcohol [but not pass-out/black-out/slurring/stumbling drunk] and/or weed and coke (they were partying, after all); I suspect she agreed to group sex, and the next day finally put the pieces together that Rose didn’t give a shit about her and basically…

Rose is a dirtbag. He’s probably not the first dirtbag you, or I, or anyone, has whole-heartedly rooted for. Most are able to keep this on the DL.

I can’t help but think that the plaintiff’s attorneys overplayed their hand - the theory of the case that Rose and his buddies broke into her apartment to gang rape her sounds fairly incredible.

They call this “The Rutgers Effect”.

Wouldn’t you have to disclose in order to claim ADA protection?