Actually there is video proof that they DID meet before then. While this speaks nothing of their relationship, it DOES prove that they are both lieing about when they met. http://i.imgur.com/lJJ7oDR.png

I'm waiting for more information to come out about this. I appreciate the note, but I'm always skeptical with self investigation into situations where the outcome could be detrimental, it's far too easy to say you looked into things and report that all is well, regardless of what (if anything) was found.

Quinn's ex released all kinds of private conversations and screenshots in which she admits to cheating on him with five different guys. One of them being Nathan Grayson and the other four being her married boss and three other indie devs.

As long as I can still pirate shit on the intranet, I'm okay with this.

Or maybe set a big lowercase 't' on fire.....for 'time to leave'?

And have the police considered dressing up like ghosts and scaring the protesters away?

Yes, with lots of hands on work. And by "hands on" I mean hands on the trigger while you wave your gun at protesters of all ages and the media.

It's sad that we value white women more than black women even when they have swirly fucked up faces.

I'm going to hell for laughing at that.

Now that she got kicked out of the sorority she'll have a lot more free time. Does the Ferguson Police Department have a work study program?

No one's slick as Gaston

For some reason, I initially read this as "extraterrestrial dating sites" and got waaaaayyy too excited.

The fact of the matter is that entry and exit wounds (if there are exit wounds) are what's most important, here. They can determine whether the wounds were inflicted from close up or further away (if there was a struggle, the assumption would be that they were from close range, which would affect the wound, gunpowder…

Hmm...anti-monogamy website analyzes emails and discovers that monogamy doesn't work. Isn't that like analyzing Microsoft's corporate mail server and discovering that everyone loves Windows 8?

The problem is not ~society, but dishonesty from partners and hypocrisy when entering relationships. Everybody does whatever they want in the end, society be damned. Society is not forcing anyone to be dishonest. People are dishonest on their own. If you truly believe in your lifestyle, you'll find a way to live it…

I don't at all think monogamy is for everyone, or even perhaps most. But cheating is still a choice, and the cheater doesn't get to brush off their actions 'because society'. I have zero patience or tolerance for cheaters...putting aside all of the emotional issues it raises, cheating is dangerous to the health of…

So this guy's outlook on the sociological history and tenets of marriage, relationships and monogamy is "I want to be married and cheat and women should just understand that and appreciate my greatness. But still feel bad because if you don't feel bad it's no fun to cheat, but forgive me because I'm so awesome."

Ashley Madison would still exist. Even if it were socially acceptable to tell your partner that monogamy wasn't working out, people would still want to hide it because many people who cheat want to have their cake and eat it too.

"Women may therefore look at their monogamous relationships and consider themselves sexually deprived in comparison to what they see occurring in today's sexualized culture."

So...he's determined that monogamy is a failure by looking only at the people who use a site that helps them cheat on their spouse?