darwinscrazyaunt
DarwinsCrazyAunt
darwinscrazyaunt

The hard evidence that she actually broke any laws is somewhere between ‘scant’ and ‘non-existant.’

It’s not clear that she was in the wrong; the local law states that running in the main part of the road is illegal (she claims she was inside the line, not in the driving portion of the road) if there is no sidewalk available (the officer has no footage of her running where there is a sidewalk). So there is scant

That’s a false equivalency if I’ve ever heard one. Running on the road is not even close to as dangerous or unnecessary as a car driving on a sidewalk.

Sorry, is there something about comments I’ve made before that invalidates whatever I’m saying here? Or do you just find my perspective disagreeable, and therefore you ignore any argument I’m going to make? Not that I feel compelled to garner your attention, I’m just curious whether you make casual logical errors on a

Team USA dominated, but their victory was never quite as assured as UConn’s seems to be. Plus those were players who were playing for teams that we had watched that WERE competitive with each other. And nationalism is a thing that exists.

Seconding this. I had a partner who would orgasm very easily from penetration, but it became very painful soon after orgasm. I tend to get very, very soft as soon as I finish. So the timing had to be perfect or one of us was going to be very grumpy. If I finished too soon, I couldn’t finish her. If I lasted too long

Nazis were also strictly against private gun ownership, in favor of socialized healthcare, in favor of state run education, and a long list of other perfectly progressive things that I’m sure you would support. Simply saying “don’t side with Nazis” without explaining what’s wrong with a particular proposition is

I find the idea of a “personal” account being separate from any other account kind of nonsensical when the account is available to the public. By making it public, it ceases to be personal in any sense of the word.

I’m assuming this is a reference to the questionable arms-out-at-the-finish that put Pretty White Girl (TM) Molly Huddle in first and an African athlete second at the recent New York City half marathon by a fraction of a second.

Also FYI: running tights are not the same thing as leggings, and are pretty much standard wear for men who run (especially in colder places like Chicago).

At a guess, that fact that he does best on college campuses probably contributes a little bit to that.

Agreed. I browse other stories here and there, but I really only come to Deadspin to see more mainstreamed coverage of running than the nuanced looks I get on flotrack and letsrun. This is my only source of mainstream articles about running.

Because the median finishing time at the majors (New York, Chicago, LA, etc.) used to be in the mid 3:30s, and has slowed down to 4:15. Oprah ran 4:29. Breaking 4:00 means that you can only run a little over a minute faster per mile than OPRAH. There has been a cultural shift in marathoning in the past 15-20 years

No. They also get tested less for doping.

This, 1000x this. The tall (though obviously very skinny) Kenyans used to intentionally surround and block the very short Haile Gebrselassie midway through track races. Throwing elbows, trapping him, trying to impede him so one of their teammates could get enough of a lead to beat him. They even did this in the

That’s happened before, and it wasn’t.

Yeah, but Tough Mudder isn’t a race. They don’t even time them. People even complained enough that they had to change their slogan from being “world’s toughest race” to “world’s toughtest running event.”

I’ve always thought that full-contact games of Capture the Flag would be great at the professional, NCAA, and even HS levels. Do it on a large field with obstacles and obstructions with big cameras overhead for both spectators and refs.

Maybe. It depends. I’ll use the Pats almost undefeated season again. Do we rate 2007 as a down year for the quality of the teams in the NFL? If so, I don’t hear anyone talking about that when the subject of the 2007 Pats comes up. I would argue instead that the quality of the competition only comes into question when

The Pats going 19-0 could still have involved a number of highly exciting games due to parity of the competition. Being the best and not making any mistakes within a given period of time is what makes it exciting. But if the Patriots went 19-0 for 2, 3, or 4 consecutive seasons and won all their games up to and