If Wakefield is dating her, he already had access to “monied and influential people”. She’s not his onramp. Clearly he was already on the highway.

I’m looking for an education when I ask this so please be gentle. :-)

A pair of tongs and a bucket of water will do the trick. If you’re worried it will squirm away, add a glue trap to the mix. Don’t have any measure of regret.

“...treason can only be committed if you collaborate with a foreign power against the interests of the US during a time of war.” 

“...or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.”

I hope Trump doesn’t break his arm jerking off Putin.

Yes and yes.

They’ll argue (publicly anyway) that the interview was edited to twist their words and to make them look bad. Their constituents will never look into it and will just believe them. 

Apropos of nothing (other than an Australian podcast I was listening to today) it fascinates me that Australians use plural verb tenses when referring to a company. “Stan have...” instead of the American “Stan has”. Does hearing the reverse bug you? Any idea why this is a thing? Does it apply when a company consists…

Add pus to dairy? 😂😂😂😂😂

I love how you misunderstood the original post and then doubled down.  Work on your reading comprehension, crackshot.

Let me know if he replies. I’ll drove down and we can all go wine tasting after. 👍

“As Johnson told the Post...”

Please elaborate...

That’s what I was thinking too. Oh twitter. You so crayzay. 

Well that’s just adorable. 😂

The President is not the boss of a congressional intern. Nor even in her chain of command. Congress doesn’t answer to the president.

Lighter and carefree, yes. But I also want to unravel a centuries old mystery involving Victor Garber and, to a lesser extent, Ron Rifkin.

Or “Cody”. Such a dumb name.

T.J. McChucklenuts, you sir (or madam) can really turn a phrase.