I loved my MX-3, it was to be honest my favorite of all the cars I've owned. Yes, I'd have wanted it as a 2+2 RWD, but aside from that it was perfect.

Wipe out the Xena infestation? I think that might have made for a better game.

You being one of those people on Jalopnik, you realize? Irony seems utterly lost on you, but thanks for the laugh.

Again, you and the idiot at Ferrari who sent the moronic C&D letter are the only ones that share your legal theory, and I'm beginning to suspect you are one and the same. But hey, you've got your heels dug in despite multiple people telling you you're wrong, so clearly there's no point in continuing. Good luck.

Have you noticed that absolutely no one in this thread agrees with your bizarre legal interpretation? Have you considered that maybe it's because you're so far out in left field you're actually in the parking lot?

What part of doctrine of first sale do you not understand? Once you have bought an item, it's yours to do with as you please and that includes reselling it with or without modifications. YES you could buy a bag of chips, slap a sticker on it (or not) and sell it again if anyone would buy it. In fact that's done all…

So you would be buying Ferraris, presumably at retail, than adding a different badge and reselling them? One I don't see how in the hell you could make a profit, and two they're your cars once you've bought them so you can do whatever the hell you want.

You go to hell and you die!

Is that a JeePuke?

I've seen one of those done up as Ecto 1 at a comics convention. It looked amazingly perfect.

This is not a bear-rabbit-angel thing. It is a little girl, it is a cartoon character, it is a friend, but it is not a bear-rabbit-angel thing.

I can't speak for the other games referenced as I've not played them, but attacking GTA for being "insensitive" is laughable. Seriously.

Yes, in GTA women and their bodies are there as props for the main character to claim, use, abuse, and destroy at will. You know what else is that way in that game?ABSOLUTELY…

We have made progress. The majority of America was behind what happened in those places in those days and we're still seeing their remnants not quite yet dead and gone. Today, however, those in support of this abomination are a small minority drowned out by a massive backlash of righteous condemnation.

I don't think we ever came closer than that time in the 80s where the Soviets actually got a false alarm and gave the launch orders, and one sharp-eyed commander had the wit and sense to doublecheck everything. Had he not caught the error, we wouldn't be talking about this now.

It's cars like this that scream for an option of "desirable but overpriced".

They were doing it at my elementary school in 1980, but that might have been for tornadoes or something though I suspect it was just a matter of an administration not getting around to changing the policy long after it was outdated. At that point they weren't telling us what we were ducking and covering -from-, just…

So sue and use the money to move somewhere nicer?

They stopped doing "duck and cover" in the 70s and 80s because it was pointless. With 50s atomic bombs, you can survive if you take shelter, with thermonuclear weapons the only maneuver available is "kiss your ass goodbye".

Presuming you're telling the truth, all that proves is that you managed to interview a disproportionate number of Apple users. It doesn't change the fact that the Commodore 64 outsold every other computer (including PC and Apple) by a significant margin and was the dominant machine of the 1980s.