darthmeow
Darth Meow 504
darthmeow

Again, you and the idiot at Ferrari who sent the moronic C&D letter are the only ones that share your legal theory, and I'm beginning to suspect you are one and the same. But hey, you've got your heels dug in despite multiple people telling you you're wrong, so clearly there's no point in continuing. Good luck.

Have you noticed that absolutely no one in this thread agrees with your bizarre legal interpretation? Have you considered that maybe it's because you're so far out in left field you're actually in the parking lot?

What part of doctrine of first sale do you not understand? Once you have bought an item, it's yours to do with as you please and that includes reselling it with or without modifications. YES you could buy a bag of chips, slap a sticker on it (or not) and sell it again if anyone would buy it. In fact that's done all

So you would be buying Ferraris, presumably at retail, than adding a different badge and reselling them? One I don't see how in the hell you could make a profit, and two they're your cars once you've bought them so you can do whatever the hell you want.

You go to hell and you die!

Is that a JeePuke?

I've seen one of those done up as Ecto 1 at a comics convention. It looked amazingly perfect.

This is not a bear-rabbit-angel thing. It is a little girl, it is a cartoon character, it is a friend, but it is not a bear-rabbit-angel thing.

I can't speak for the other games referenced as I've not played them, but attacking GTA for being "insensitive" is laughable. Seriously.

Yes, in GTA women and their bodies are there as props for the main character to claim, use, abuse, and destroy at will. You know what else is that way in that game?ABSOLUTELY

We have made progress. The majority of America was behind what happened in those places in those days and we're still seeing their remnants not quite yet dead and gone. Today, however, those in support of this abomination are a small minority drowned out by a massive backlash of righteous condemnation.

I don't think we ever came closer than that time in the 80s where the Soviets actually got a false alarm and gave the launch orders, and one sharp-eyed commander had the wit and sense to doublecheck everything. Had he not caught the error, we wouldn't be talking about this now.

It's cars like this that scream for an option of "desirable but overpriced".

They were doing it at my elementary school in 1980, but that might have been for tornadoes or something though I suspect it was just a matter of an administration not getting around to changing the policy long after it was outdated. At that point they weren't telling us what we were ducking and covering -from-, just

So sue and use the money to move somewhere nicer?

They stopped doing "duck and cover" in the 70s and 80s because it was pointless. With 50s atomic bombs, you can survive if you take shelter, with thermonuclear weapons the only maneuver available is "kiss your ass goodbye".

Presuming you're telling the truth, all that proves is that you managed to interview a disproportionate number of Apple users. It doesn't change the fact that the Commodore 64 outsold every other computer (including PC and Apple) by a significant margin and was the dominant machine of the 1980s.

What is your sample size for this amateur poll you ran? Did you control for any variables? Keep any records? Can you show data at all? Also, what are the dates? Because Commodore was dominant from 1982 to 1992, and if your poll respondents only remember back to the 90s (when Macintosh became commonly available to

You're just determined to be hostile and hateful. Not a fun way to live and not a good way to make friends, either. But clearly I can't talk you out of it, so good luck with that.

The plural of anecdote is not data. I don't base my statements on who I knew or what my personal experience was, I base it on cold hard sales figures. Data that totaled both US and worldwide sales.