This is a troll.

You mean like... It’s ironic that he’s fighting with Canada and making up with North Korea? I can see that, I guess.

This student mentioned pro-lifers in a positive light in his speech: “The young people must be willing to speak candidly about issues, and we mustn’t tremble in the face of the institutions that try to silence us. We’ve already accomplished this in our own community... Many of you went on the March for Life to protect…

His grammar is fine. Some mistakes but totally legible. It’s his logic that’s at fault.

Okay, but if “witch hunts” aren’t wrong then why do you think there needs to be criticism of the witch hunts against men in the U.S.? I can tell already we’re not going to get anywhere by arguing but your basic point is very jumbled.

So wait... you sound like you’re trying to say people shouldn’t be “witch hunted” regardless of sex... but you don’t have a problem with “hunting down all feminists”? Something tells me you have more of a problem with feminism than you do with sexism and racism, despite your claims to the contrary

Neither can a dumbass vest, but Han wore it anyway

All I’m saying is that what he did was illegal, and the laws against it exist for very good reasons, and that he should therefore be legally punished.

Legally, yes you do when it comes to sexual contact... Which this was given that nudes were sent by both parties. Enjoying attention isn’t a crime. Soliciting nudes from a minor, and trying to convince her to fly to meet you for sexual purposes is.

Psybab’s right here. This was a crime. As the article states, Sanchez was in California, which has laws against asking minors for nude pictures.

...Why not Penelope? It’s a very popular name at this point.

“At what age does a child start to havbe to take some responsibility for her actions.”

Sharing differing points of view is great, right?

Don’t flatter yourself, I’m not going through your comment history. I did, however, read this whole thread that you started, because I’m willing to consider viewpoints other than my own... the very thing you claim Kotaku commenters refuse to do.

Don’t flatter yourself, I’m not going through your comment history. I did, however, read this whole thread that you started, because I’m willing to consider viewpoints other than my own... the very thing you claim Kotaku commenters refuse to do.

You, to someone who agrees with you in a reasonable, level-headed comment: “Most people on Kotaku are incredibly difficult to converse with. Even the slightest disagreement to an article will make them run their pitchforks down your throat. Having rational discussion is rare, so thank you for the opportunity.”

You: “Why do we have to shame him?”

But saying “why are we talking about the punishment for the alleged child predator and not the punishment for his alleged victim?” seems like kind of a dickish thing to bring up, no? Feel free to talk about whatever you want but people got pissed at you for a reason.

But saying “why are we talking about the punishment for the alleged child predator and not the punishment for his alleged victim?” seems like kind of a dickish thing to bring up, no? Feel free to talk about whatever you want but people got pissed at you for a reason.

Given how many people didn’t get that, it was evidently not. Either way... That just seems kind of irrelevant to the story here? This is about his alleged crime, not his target’s parents.