didn’t we already cover this?
didn’t we already cover this?
accents, clothing, travel books, language handbooks, foreign bank cards, their own admission, etc... So add 15% and they can either question it or if they want add another 5%.
...he would NOT have been speeding had he not been actilvely (sic) chased.
That we all have cars on our bucket list, for example scent of a woman and the bucket list
That rich people park their super cars more than they drive them and often in odd places - thinking of that fast and furious where the W motors Lykan was parked in the sky rise.
counter point: the modern mid-to-small CUV is the future, they’re getting better mpg all the time, they’re more comfortable on egress and ingress for an aging population and they aren’t really as tip-over-prone any more.
don’t pursue and he doesn’t slow down much
I know this road, rt 302, and it varies from 55 mph to 30 mph zones as it travels north from Portland to Bridgton. He wasn’t on a highway, he was on a busy road with pedestrians and side traffic, he was presenting a clear danger and needed to be stopped. There are a couple of churches and a lot of Sunday traffic on…
“Him crashing was not caused by the spike strips, but was caused by him overcorrecting.”
so you’re monday morning quarter backing somebodies else’s argument... get a life
gotta be the truck bed speaker system in my 2017 ridgeline rtl-e, in theory when combined with the in bed trunk/cooler you have a tailgating winner but in practice it never gets used, would have opted out of it if I could have still gotten a sunroof and sliding rear window on the rtl-t
you’d bend the frame on the first good dip into the throttle and ruin it...
shill, go suck another politicians white shriveled dick, maybe that’s why you don’t want term limits cause your best customers will be leaving
wait you reference Pelosi in support of no term limits... your head is really up your ass
elections are not the same thing, incumbents have a huge advantage
let’s try term limits before we dismiss the idea, kay?
now that’s something we can all get behind
history is lost on you, huh?
when will you actually have a real technical discussion about net neutrality, something that actually discusses things like intralata charge backs and all the other wonderful things the FCC did under phone carrier neutrality that killed the land line? (you probably were too young)
it’s really too bad the big govt fans in the FCC can’t match the lobbying funds of the ISPs