Hey come on, social justice can be good money.

Umm, this isn’t actually the reason. This is poor quality clickbait.

I will say this - I don’t think there’s a soul here that will be mad at the casting for this project. It’s inclusive and everyone seems to fit their roles pretty well. No worries there.

A slur is a slur, but context is also just as valuable, and pretending that all things are equal when it comes to words and who is offended by them is just silly. 

A slur is a slur no matter who it’s aimed at. The target being white people doesn’t make it somehow okay.

The entitlement is found in those fans who complain that reviewers openly said they didn’t like it, and that casual viewers didn’t take the effort to watch it, and as a result they (the fans) won’t get a second season. Look (not you, sarusa, but hypothetical fans), if you wanted a second season, I’m sorry you’re not…

Truly delusional. The only toxic nerds here are the ones complaining people didn't watch this show.

Entitled toxic nerds didn’t kill this. It got made and it got released. What killed the second season was nobody watching the first season because it was something that (statistically) nobody wanted or asked for.

The people who Netflix needed to watch it, but didn’t watch it (typical viewers) have mostly not encountered these ‘toxic nerds’ and definitely don’t care about their opinions. They don’t live in that particular internet bubble.

By...not watching it?

Sorry you have such shit taste :(

It was pretty telling that I saw the Cowboy Bebop anime in the "Popular on Netflix" category but not the live action show.

They were forced to restart it by Court order.

Did anyone actually think Biden was any kind of environmentalist? People voted for him because he had a (D) next to his name and wasn’t Trump. In 2024, people will vote for him because he has a (D) next to his name and isn’t Trump. In 2028, they’ll vote for whoever has a (D) next to their name and isn’t…

I have to disagree with the semantics of this article. It is trying to portray the software as biased, yet it also explains that it works on reported crime data and how that is incomplete because the white and wealthy are less likely to report. On top of that, the real problem with more patrols is less about stopping…

Then by that reasoning we would see far more violent crime in trailer parks and majority white high poverty areas...yet we don’t. Most of the crime is low level drug and property-related, not murders and rapes which are far more prevalent in minority communities.

I think Sapkowski left it that way on purpose (referencing the Conjunction etc), a bit of mystery to intrigue the reader.

Someone needs to revisit the pronouns in this piece. It’s totally confusing if the article is about one person or multiple persons having a problem. She, they, their, come on...lets write something legible, ok?

Thank you. I was wondering how in Gizmodo’s eyes Mr. Liu’s actions compared to “Sexist Football Coach”, “Has-Been Actor Who Thinks Actress Isn’t Very Good”, or even “Actress Who Went To A Ball As A Teenager 22 Years Ago And Honestly Regrets It And Isn’t Actually Racist But Trust Me You Should Be Angry At Her Anyway”.

OK everybody!  We changed the video game cowboy’s name!  Problem solved!  Please resubscribe to WoW?