This is why people have trouble supporting this brand of Identity Feminism. A boatload of lies that make everyone involved look bad... and all they can do is say, “yeah, but they should still be punished.” Here is pretty much the only time, ever, one can say with a straight face and in all seriousness that this is…

This is about as clear-cut of a suit as you can get. The article made concrete accusations and claims which were determined to be entirely false.

I’d love to retitle this: “Warcraft Movie Part of Intentional Hype to Foster hype for the next Blizzard Warcraft game”.

That’s three more loads of laundry than my partner has done in five years.

I’m totally with you, here. My partner and I have a somewhat “traditional-but-swapped” relationship after I got predictably laid-off from the professional job that was killing me eighteen months ago.

Except that when we said something similar to that, she was criticized endlessly for not coming up with her own solutions.

And, to be frank, there are plenty of policies which would help this country which aren’t narrowly focused on pieces of a larger problem. Desiring one’s message to be the only message, and employing tactics which are meant to silence and disrupt against political allies is more than a little egocentric.

The problem is certainly the police, and economic terrorism which keeps minorities away from any path in life that nets them an actual retirement.

Awesome. Another national election cycle where media driven narratives overtake any thought of economic issues.

a glimmer of hope that the conversation would be done in good faith on the part of democrat candidates

Yep. The state courts ruled that the law, as written, couldn’t be used to secure a conviction for “upskirt” creeping. Hand-in-hand with the legislative branch the judicial ensured it was changed immediately. Judicial ruled; legislature fixed.

You’re correct about MA being a two-party consent state for wiretapping. However, that protection doesn’t exist in public.

I have more respect for organizations that make a decision and actually stick by it, than for any of this wishy-washy back-and-forth nonsense. They want to do the panels? fine. They want to not do the panels? also fine. But just caving to whatever group is screaming at you the loudest doesn’t change or help anything.

I find it kind-of funny that people put so much emphasis on the “gamer” label. I think you’re right: people who clutch to that label are often those who are at the core of the problem.

She knows she can make her friends who make her president richer. Amazing and so progressive, eh?

Well, that is a verb that is at the crux of the statement. We “could” elect a socialist; we could also elect Trump.

As a former Sec of State she shouldn’t be running. SoS is a job that creates, itself, more bad press than anything else. SoS has the least chance of winning nomination. Like VP.

Man, I’m an Anarchist. This is the first American Politician that has actually had me register to vote... well, ever.

Man, For the first time ever we could elect a Socialist President. A fucking Socialist!

Remember when she stood up to the banks and demanded Americans be treated like people and not profits? Uhg... me neither. That never happened.