There is literally nothing different between that argument and “If he didn’t want to get killed, he shouldn’t have been selling untaxed cigarettes!”

It was illegal. That doesn’t make it unsafe or immoral, and it was not the cause of the crash.

So you’re saying passing on a double yellow justifies attempted murder? Go fuck yourself.

Already happened in the original article. Comments were full of idiots pointing fingers at the rider because “OMG THAT’S ILLEGAL.”

Nevermind that it was a perfectly safe pass on a straightaway with plenty of visibility, past a guy who was intentionally going well under the speed limit to antagonize them.

Frankly, I find necrophilia rape less distasteful than unconscious rape because the victim isn’t going to wake up and have to deal with the horror and trauma of the rape.

1. Who cares about his feelings, but also 2. I hope it ruined him.

Pretty much guessing he didn’t care, as he was willing to rape an unconscious person.

Uh, yeah, let’s wonder about how the murdering rapist felt when he realized the girl he’d just pushed down the stairs (at least to unconsciousness) and raped, was actually dead, and how that must have been ickier for him that just raping an injured-unconscious girl.

Can’t be any worse than what was going through his mind when he pushed a 13 year old girl down the stairs for not sleeping with him, or when he saw that she wasn’t responding and decided to have sex with rape her.

The Washington Post article says he originally thought she was knocked unconscious, raped her, and then realized she was dead. Ugh. I never understand how in cases where someone is unconscious (like drinking or anything) the first thought isn’t “should check if okay” but ‘lets stick my dick in it.’

He was 17. She was 13. I’m guessing he had a significant strength/size advantage over her. “Women are afraid that men will kill them” easily translates to “teenage girls are afraid teenage boys will kill them”. Don’t be obtuse.

Because a dude’s need to get his dick wet is so much more important than someone’s life.

If you find people complaining on the internet to be triggering, an option for you would be to avoid reading articles with titles similar to this one. Barely anyone cares what you’re reading, and even fewer will care about what you aren’t reading.

“...murdered for refusing to have sex with Ferreira at a party.”

Well, generally speaking, modern culture isn’t big on sweeping murder under the rug, or convincing people who’ve survived attempted murders that it was just a misunderstanding (and possibly one they themselves are responsible for), or glamorizing murder for advertising. Nor are there sweeping narratives dedicated to…

You say that like it’s a bad thing. We already have content advisories before shows. What would be so terrible about people who decided they weren’t interested in viewing either murder or rape choosing to change the channel ahead of time?

Let’s be real here: bad things don’t happen on TV with anything like the same frequency as they do in real life. They’re there not to reflect reality (especially not in a fantasy show about people disappearing suddenly) but because we find violence in general and sexual violence in particular to be entertaining.…

Calm down, maybe?

Once again I am utterly astounded by the lack of empathy from human beings. It’s not surprising that I couldn’t report it WHEN I WAS 7! Having been attacked doesn’t make me a baby. The fact I escaped and lived means I am a survivor.

Murder is not something most people survive and deal with the personal traumas of, so I see where you’re going with this, but I’m gonna have to disagree.