Ah! Thank you! This is an excellent explanation. The article makes it sound as if miscarriage itself is directly against the law. But it's more that it's extremely easy for women who miscarry to get caught by excessively restrictive abortion laws.
Right, that makes sense. But, the article is making it sound that if the test was ruled unsound, the women would be exonerated. Which would imply that if the fetus died in-utero, the woman wouldn't have committed a crime.
Question: If miscarriages are against the law (which is some next-level horror-movie-grade nightmare fuel), why does it matter if the fetus in question died before or after delivery?
I swear at my cat all the time. She actually woke up when that audio played and wandered over for snuggles.
I agree. Personally, I don't blame her, and I find it kind of ridiculous that everyone else is She's a nurse. Infectious disease control is not her job. She is not an expert in infectious disease control. When she started showing symptoms, she called the CDC and they said she was fine to travel. The only mistake she…
Even if he can't educate O'Reilly, it's entirely beneficial to have debates like this up on TV. He's making sound arguments and doesn't come off like a hyperaggressive douchebag, so a segment like this might give viewers who have never really considered the points he's making great food for thought.
Maybe it's cause I'm bisexual with a preference for women, so I'm not entirely wed to the idea of PIV sex anyway, but I could just not give less of a shit, personally.
I find your use of "black bodies" and "white bodies" instead of "black people" and "white people" to be unfuckingspeakably creepy. Was that intentional? Are you making a point?
I much appreciate the warning to stay out of pending comments. Thanks!
I think the way I would respond to that is that there's sort of a hierarchy of importance. Let's say there's a scale of importance that goes from 1 to 10. Being polite to people who are being polite to you is something you should probably do to make the world a better place. Let's assign that an importance level of...…
You can understand murdering 38 people because they're annoying you at work?
You're not allowed to torture animals either. Same principle.
I'm a staunch atheist and all, but you really need to chill out.
But what if a gust of wind blows open your neighbour's blinds and you see her naked. Is that wrong?
The specific thing you are culpable for is viewing someone's naked body without their consent.
I use 4chan sporadically. It's not a monolith, but it's certainly more uniform than reddit. Some boards, like /lgbt/ and /an/ and /tg/ are relatively friendly, and child porn is pretty much confined to /b/ and rarer than you may think. But racism and sexism still abound. The atmosphere is endlessly hostile.
By viewing the naked images without the consent of the person pictured, you are violating their privacy. The people who stole and published these photos are more culpable for this violation than people like you, but you are culpable in it all the same.
Wow, you're an incredible asshole.
Fair enough.