Alright. To be clear I never argued there was only one way to understand sexual violence (and certainly never advocated an academic one lol) but that there are SO many perspectives and complexities and structural forces that contribute to sexual violence and that we must strive to account for this multiplicity when…

also, saying “take the gender out of if,” immediately negates your argument. gender is always haunted by history, by the past, and ignoring the very real societal significane of sexist oppression past and present is like asking me to believe in magic or other imaginary things. If your argument only works to the extent…

First of all, you always whine about being labeled a “misogynist” and “MRA,” but you have no problem labeling those you disagree with “feminist extremists,” as if that somehow invalidates their argument. Stop with the nonsense. I am a radical feminist, and a lot of my beliefs and practices are rooted in logic, ethics,…

..... I want you to think deeply about that and truly ask yourself if you think those things are equatable. I am not saying greed and exclusionary standards by women are okay- but I am straight up dumbfounded that you think a preference for wealth is equatable to a desire/demand/expectation of virginity. I really am…

What we desperately need to understand is that “video evidence” fails to be viewed objectively: ie: Rodney king. The visual field is racialized- an image is never neutral. If racist scripts in society culminate in hieghtened fear of black men, video evidence of relatively benign behavior can transmogrify into…

Hi there. I initially planned on not responding to your comment- but upon rereading it I know that you are earnestly trying to engage with me and it would be wrong of me to ignore you out of frustration/confusion/stubbornness. So, I will do my best to respond to your points and to keep this as short as possible. Here…

false equivocation is your favorite logical fallacy to employ. give it up!

sending love to you :)

whew. have a good one.

if you’re white you’be benefited from white privilege whether you realize it or not. to not recognize this is willful ignorance.

no one is assuming you’re a homophobe because of your sexual preferace.... your words are all the evidence of that we need. Also, going into a safe space for gay people and engaging in straight pda is not a benign or chill action. Queer spaces are often the only places patrons can go to feel free, recognized, and at…

how am i redefining sexism im pretty sure i only know one definition

I never said anything to the contrary nor do I think in “ethical absolutes,” —- I had a problem with your unfounded and to be frank bizarre thinking that was not representative of futurist thinking but just straight up absurd blabber. im done with this. but thanks for the laughter. have a good one.

Why do you think the introduction of sex robots would lessen types of sexual violence, like human trafficking? Logically chart out that argument and I will gladly engage with you. but the fact is there is no support for that assumption and it rests on really antiquated and false understandings about sexual violence.

what!!! you this there robots “are made to be raped,” (dunno where you figured that) and now are saying you dont see an ethical issue?!?! holy shit this has gone too far

I wish I unserstood what point you are trying to make I really dont explain?

my heart is bursting. the love of canines is an example for us all. going to go hug my dog now.

“everyone else,”k.

plz quote my negative language. haven’t used any to my knowledge. than take note of the disrespectful and immature ways you have regarded me from the very beginning. your lack of self awareness is very confusing to me.

in your first comment you used “machines.” If you weren’t talking about vibrators what were you talking about? you are trying to go back and explain away/change so much of your initial argument there is no way I can respond. It is clear you know you were wrong. moving on.