and a hole and a robotic made to look like an anatomically correct woman are not the same thing either. So your point is mute.

I couldn’t possibly agree with your false equivocation of a vibrator, with a artificially intelligent sex robot and, I’ll start there. You are slow at this

Furthemore, until you make a sound argument I won’t further a discussion with someone who clearly doesn’t understand the terms of it

also... “big faux paw there” who the fuck do you think you are? damn gawker really goes to peoples heads. check yrself

no my argumentation is logic and if I copy pasted somewhere it is because I am half a sleep and now someone has a wrong comment, cry me a river. Anyway, I figured you wouldn’t accept any thinking that challenges your thoughts and here I am proven right, you would rather just say that im wrong without proving it (you…

NO you didn’t get my point... because you don’t understand what is going on here. Both genders and all humans should be able to use machines to get off, whatever floats their boat. But to argue against this technological censorship as if men are being prosecuted for a behavior women “already do,” is nonsense. Your…

A phallus and a penis are not the same thing.

A phallus and a penis are not the same thing.

By arguing that objects (robots) would eliminate sexual violence you perpetuate a narrow understanding of rape that DOES constitute women as objects while outwardly objecting to sexist violence. By arguing that sexist “objectification” is amendable through the introduction of sexed OBJECTS you misuse this metaphorical…

THANK YOU. so many people on this site fear nuanced analysis (preferring sloppy and under-theorized generalizations) .... everyone needs to understand that explanation is NOT exoneration. If we do not understand the power dynamics and social conditions that enable/facilitate in acts of violence we have no hope in…

yah blame feminism thats the move #therearenowaves

So .... you don’t understand what a metaphor is? Don’t enjoy logical reasoning? In that case spend more time thinking and less time dehumanizing women with your sloppy argumentation.

no shade, but it really seems like you have never interacted with other humans before. That, and, your absolute exclusion of nuanced reasoning makes it sound like you are the victim in a dystopian blockbuster being hunted by deranged ovaries with legs. Lastly, you have to find a way to get real with yourself- being so…

Equivocation is not sound reasoning- so no, me calling you on your bullshit is not the same as your outright refusal to accept an entire group of people as autonomous and fully human.

Logical Fallacy 101: false equivocation.

I want to laugh but I can’t because your thought is too fucked up and extraordinarily out of touch so instead I will have another drink.

What you are describing is internalized sexism. Furthermore, contrary to what you seem to believe, power is not neutral or natural. Read a book dude.

by gateway to sex do you mean that they have the right to consent? Seems like you are confused about a lot but we can start here.

No, sex work is not paid rape- and arguing that they are the same is dehumanizing and silencing to sex workers who act with agency, awareness, and free choice. It’s funny how you and those who share your perspective claim concern for sex workers at the same time as you deny their experiences and perspectives. Your…

please do explain this ridiculous and illogical statement. I need a laugh