Josh Gordon's test was also proven to be inaccurate and the NFL still suspended him.....Sherman shouldn't be throwing the guy under the bus who kept him in the league

uh not exactly, but Sherman shouldn't be attacking the guy who decided his PED use wasn't bannable even though it was exactly the same as Ngata and other players who WERE suspended

Says the guy who wasn't punished for using PED's....

Shawn Michaels just looks like 75% of the population of Alabama on any non-game day.

Really should've been an offset... the flag on lang was already coming no need to push/punch/get your ass tossed on the ground if you are the cowboys.

Only a man named Antonor would name his son Jameis

The Pizza Hut franchise near my house doesn't offer the "new" toppings and stuff from Pizza Hut's national campaign, doesn't accept coupons and you can only use cash at the store (they also don't support online ordering). I wish pizza hut would sue them so I could have my cheap quick and easy pizza's back

He sounds like he just feels so bad for Jamies by his tone

You also missed when FSU got lucky against Clemson, when the running back fumbled the ball untouched at the FSU 20 yard line with under a minute to go

Why on earth would he choose the god awful Raiders over a Michigan team that will give him a literal truck load of cash as well as complete and utter control of every aspect of the program

This is going to be my last reply to you, because you simply cannot comprehend the words I type and continue to give plenty of valid reasons to not allow someone to change a seat, none of which prove in any way that there is a COST that the airline must pay if someone sits in a different seat. There is no extra money…

The value is 0 if no one is in the seat. You are using plenty of valid arguments as to why she shouldn't have been allowed to move seats, and I agree with all of them. BUT none of them are "because it would COST the airline money to allow her to move from seat to another"

Allowing someone to switch seats once the flight taxied off the gate still doesn't COST any money. Sure she could've asked for an upgrade before she left, but maybe that ticket was sold and someone missed the flight... moving from one seat to another, once a plane has left the gate COSTS nothing.

which like I said is a completely valid argument and I have no problems with it. What I have a problem with is once again the Author of the article stating that allowing her to sit in a different seat would cost them money.

Which is a valid point... the point that is not valid is that the author stated that allowing her to switch seats COSTS the airline money

which doesn't cost the airline anything...

"seat swaps that costs the airlines money"

wait we are really subscribing to the "OMG PLAYSTATION SO POPULAR FOR CHRISTMAS IT LITERALLY BROKE PSN" theory? Yea ok

Maybe knowing the difference between a hacker and a kid who presses a button over and over would be better for you journalistically then

You know that is also him rapping to the song, not just someone else riding his dick right?