Then wouldn’t the graph indicate higher general sales, not the huge crash that happened for a lot of these, in most cases, extremely well reviewed games.
Then wouldn’t the graph indicate higher general sales, not the huge crash that happened for a lot of these, in most cases, extremely well reviewed games.
I think it goes back even further than that though. Think about Dany’s wedding night in the book and on the show. In the book, Khal Drogo was gentle, and took his time and actually gave her a choice about having sex (as told from her perspective). The show made that scene brutish and ugly and clearly non-consensual.
I think Cal juiced her, because it seems very much like his rage in that scene.
Maybe I’d be more willing to believe that if you didn’t cover a game that you did voice work on (Space Pirates and Zombies). You mentioned that you did voice work for it in the WTF video, but that was clearly a case where you had more than a perceived bias. But you still covered that.
If you missed it, it is online at Adult Swim.
If anyone missed it, the whole episode is on Adult Swim right now too.
Here the thing that keeps bugging me in all this though. According to the first season of AoS, SHIELD had a record of all the people with super powers and technologies that potentially made them super heroes/villains, and now all that information is public, available to everyone.
It also said the rats fled the grounded ship near the harbor of Bergen, so it was close to human settlements when it crashed.
It was amazing television, that's for sure.
And they had the justification for doing it to with the mechanics of how two people actually operate a jaeger together mentally and all the talk about them being so in sync with each other.
But does Marvel have the right to use the character on AoS since she's an X-Men character.
The thing that I was thinking about was how many times Ward talked to Skye about her father and tried to give her information/get her to meet him. So they know each other at least by reputation.
Wow that cast!
They started throttling right after Verizon won this lawsuit: http://online.wsj.com/articles/SB100…
Cubs peak yearly attendance was in 2008: 3.3 million
The problem is, people will go see the Cubs no matter how good or bad they are, so there is no incentive for them to improve. Why invest money in winning under those circumstances?
I thought they were setting this scenario up from the ending of the first Avengers movie.
Whenever I watch Moonraker, I always imagine Sacha Baron Cohen redubbing the Drax part as Jean Girard from Talladega Nights
I know that in many cases, legal and marketing departments at a lot of media companies are having fights about this sort of thing every day.
The shot that elicited a wonder face from me: