It looks like a MMC design rather than an FMC. The changes compared to the first year of the 5 probably aren’t going to be apparent to most people. I feel like we’ve been looking at basically the same vehicle since the 2006 concept.

Looking at the rear spoiler, all I can see is this:

You need to tikka deep, hard look at yourself.

Forget Skinner, Wolfcastle is the real omission.

That goal by Stepan was even bigger than Lundqvist’s pads.

I’m guessing that the braking and cornering of these cars isn’t as good as stock (not to mention the instances of poorly modified ones where it looks like the subframe is about to snap), but is there any information as to how much worse it is and if it is materially worse?

Really? I clicked on vehicles at Mazdausa.com and couldn’t find it.

My guess is it’ll be sold in Canada but not the US, just like the current Mazda2.

Anyone else think this whole fiasco ended up eventually being a good thing for viewers?

To not annoy the driver, it could be something like on the Genesis I drove where if something is in your blindspot, that side’s mirror lights up a yellow light and if you try to turn into that lane while the blindspot system is activated it’ll vibrate the steering while and chime an alert.

Just something like on the Genesis I drove where if something is in your blindspot, that side’s mirror lights up yellow and if you try to turn while the blindspot system is activated it’ll vibrate the steering while and chime an alert.

I’m glad everyone is relatively okay.

You’re not my buddy, pal.

I hope Mr. Sarge gets something for his diligence and effort.

Does this include bars? And if so, I’m guessing its based off of the capacity of the bar just like the fee was?

I would think it depends on the locale. Here, you’re owed a duty of care even to trespassers (which is really stupid, IMO) and a disclaimer isn’t enough. If you have a construction site with 4 feet fencing (apparently a reasonable amount is 6 feet) and someone climbs it and gets hurt on the site, you can be sued.

But what if it establishes a precedent and they want to avoid it (or would that not really be applicable; I’m not too familiar with US law)?

Every new logo has a circle crest (Brooklyn, Toronto, Milwaukee, Washington, and now this). It looks like its a league mandated thing, probably for the future when they inevitable try soccer style jerseys with ads on the front and team crests in the upper corner. Yuck.

I’m not sure what company publicly lists all testing failures of their prototypes, regardless of how transparent or not they are.