Well nuts. I didn’t even realize the second season had come out. 

Ah hey there. I see that, once again, your ‘cooldown period’ of writing normal comments is over, and you’re back to the one-line ad homs. I’ve noticed you go through this cycle before. Tell me: is it actual mental illness that’s causing you to loop like this? Or are the other posts there to fool people into thinking…

That’s a lot misogyny to unpack. You clearly don’t know who Feist is. She’s very popular, has toured for almost a couple decades now, has won 12 Juno awards alone, Grammy nominated 4 times, and is just fine, thanks. Why do think Arcade Fire wanted her as an opener in the first place? She’s one of the biggest Canadian…

To add to what you’ve said, there are a couple other points about this article that I’ve not seen addressed anywhere, and which make me very suspicious about the motivations behind it.

You may be right about persons 1-3, but assault is assault.

Are standing ovations ableist? Can that be a hot take?

“Now the library’s more than just a quiet place to shoot someone!”

For what, stating facts? Why does that make you mad?

Jesus Christ, since this stupid, illogical, brainless, witless, wrongheaded, pointless, bad faith argument is rearing its ugly head once again: THE PHRASE “PEOPLE WHO MENSTRUATE” IS DOING THE EXACT OPPOSITE OF “REDUCING WOMEN DOWN TO THEIR BODILY FUNCTIONS.” TERFS ARE THE ONES TRYING TO MAKE POSSESSION OF A UTERUS A…

More than that. It’s over 1200 pages long!

Rowling shared recently on The Graham Norton Show. “I said to my husband, ‘I think everyone is going to see this as a response to what happened to me,’ but it genuinely wasn’t. The first draft of the book was finished at the point certain things happened.”

Couple hundred pages nothing, this latest is closer to a thousand, from what I understand...

She also tries to claim that these beliefs don’t mirror the far right on trans rights. They do. No matter how many times she wants to tell us some of her best friends are trans...

The problem isn’t just that her beliefs are at best ill-informed and at worst discriminatory garbage. The problem is that she seems to think continuously doubling down on it in favor of something that reads as “I’ve done my research!” is somehow different from the right-wing politicians she decries. And frankly, if…

I seem to remember a comment in the first season as well about how she used to have her own group of friends before Kevin, so I’ve always assumed that he gradually isolated her from all her support networks as well as abusing her financially.

I believe the creative staff have said the sitcom world applies to men who don’t have to live with the consequences of their actions. That’s why Neil and Kevin’s father were in that world in the first season, even when Kevin wasn’t present. It takes Neil getting bottled to bring him out of that, because he is facing…

I’m guessing at the motivations of the writers, but my guess is that they don’t show Kevin outside of the sitcom world because that’s what a lot of abused women suffer with. Their abuser only shows themselves to her and most people around them either don’t see it or choose not to see any of that behavior.

We haven’t seen Kevin outside of the sitcom world. My guess is he’s much worse and not just an oaf.

I wish the show would delve into the financials more because in my opinion Kevin is engaging financial abuse and I do think it premeditated on a certain level because it isn’t played off as shopping addiction.