why should that 84% of land area be given more consideration than the plurality of individual citizens who voted?

The Electoral College makes the presidential election the best of 51 popular votes, of which Trump carried 30. And the states do have a decent amount of autonomy.

Because slaves, mythical cowboys, and farming subsidies.

The geographically concentrated PEOPLE who want to tell the other people who live in the remaining 84% of the country how to live... Sorry, but it’s (still) a stunning rebuke of past policy. He was not my candidate, but the results were pretty clear.

Every time the CGI Tarkin cocked his head, lifted an eyebrow, or really tried to do anything with his face other than just stand there saying nothing looked super creepy, and incredibly fake.

Why couldn’t it have been [X] is one of the poorest responses in these situations. Be a better person.

Sigh.

1. They often didn’t, actually. They misidentified people based on IP addresses. That’s why quite a few people fought back.

Okay, some of you seem confused about the order of what happened here so let me try and break it down for you:

I don’t know that those situations are equivalent, but you’re right I think in that something freely shared can’t by definition be stolen.

“Although the copyright infringements were often legitimate”

What I’d like to know is (and I’m being serious here) how did the hacking “help Trump win”? As far as I can tell the voting booths themselves were not hacked. If the Democrats couldn’t come up with a better candidate to defeat a guy who there was audio of saying he grabs women by the pussies, then shame on the…

So Russia hacked the DNC, (supposedly), released information showing a presidential candidate performed unethically and possibly illegally, then the US voters decided who they wanted for president? I still don’t see any problem with this. “At this point, what difference does it make!”- Hillary Clinton

1. Trying to gender a non-gendered trait/habit/thing is stupid. It’s not edgy, it’s not satirical, it’s just stupid.

Easy, you don’t like it, don’t follow them on Twitter. Better yet, don’t use Twitter. Done.

But Google was never designed to provide “correct” answers to questions. What it does is provide you links to pages which are related to the query you typed in. As in much research, it’s up to the individual asking the question to do their due diligence in determining what the “truth” really is. There may be AI’s or…

Yes, it is right. Censorship — no matter how well-intentioned — is always wrong. Always. It is always better to fight misinformation and falsehoods with the truth than to suppress it.

I think Google has a responsibility not to modify the search results manually. Google is just supposed to find you the information you are looking for, not verify the accuracy or appropriateness of that information.

When did liberals go to the dark side...seriously. Read the damn constitution for once people. This shit is allowed. It’s up there with flag burning, calling people the N word and selling your ex-husbands harley davidson for 5 dollars to spite his ass after he cheated on you with the babysitter.