And women can exist and have nerdy passions that have nothing to do with whether they have a nerdy partner or not.

Oh god, I actually owned this book back in college during the height of 3E D&D. Once I got it I realized there was no fucking way I was going to use any of that material in any game I ran or played. I bought it because I was a nerdy 20-year-old college student and thought it might be fun.

I think they should have inverted the process: Instead of ratcheting down the nudity for women, they should have ratcheted up the nudity on all sides.

“Hey timmy! i saw where guns give ya candy! and my dad.. got some guns hidden in the back of the downstairs closet!”

Folks here are saying that isn’t always the case. This could very well have happened without the player’s knowledge.

What’s why using paypal to pay for these things is an awful idea. Paypal will often initiate bad charge backs for pretty much no reason only to reverse them later.

It’s not real money, it’s just part of the game!

Except to those with gambling addictions (or people who create gambling sites and then pretend like they don’t own it while shilling it TO people with gambling addictions) it is A LOT a lot of real money.

Same reason the US cares about gambling.

He did not mention other potential addictions that members of the Vape Nation might slippery slope their way into.

I’m generally fine with fan service.

The lack of competition in wireless contributes to overpriced data plans and data caps. Do you think that companies that essentially have a duopoly and keeping prices high should be allowed to turn around and use that advantage to wipe out competition in additional sectors?

But this is more like if Amazon owned both FedEx and UPS and charged your business much more than it charged itself for delivery.

Maybe you should focus your hate on the arbitrary data caps instead of at the FCC for deciding that companies shouldn’t have unfair advantages for steering you towards their own content?

It still could be. The fact that AT&T doesn’t charge you isn’t the issue really. It’s that AT&T charges people like DirectTV to get the benefit of users not being charged for their service. AT&T is able to charge you or not charge you for data, what they can’t do is violate net neutrality by only giving that service…

This is a rookie mistake. The spine of the old god is meant to be installed as part of the building foundation, not a center piece in the bloody lobby. The dark one’s will can cause headaches and nausea when the dosage is this high!

Though, Stanley Kubrick did admit that he faked the Lunar landing. The problem is that it went way over budget because he wanted to actually film on location in the Sea of Tranquility.

Do all of the stories where people sneezed in the direction of your phones and the screen cracked also amaze you? (Yes, this is an over-exaggeration... but not all that significant of one.)

More of a good story for OtterBox as for every one iPhone survival story there’s about a million “killed it by dropping it in the toilet” and “fell off the desk now it’s knackered”