The pee tape? Probably not real:

Good points!

Yes, the replies to my post that disagree have basically said (translated by me): “Yes, it originally meant what you claim, and it meant that for a long time, but over time people started mis-using it, so now we just accept when someone improperly uses the word. We’re lazy and will defend others who are both…

Told you I was!

“Halving the already decimated tiger population...”

I am arguing what this blog article was about; you’re the one trying to cast a wider net to the entire workforce, introducing concepts such as having your income defined by your zip code. Deflect, obscure, muddle...that’s what your posts have been.

Are you a Futurama fan? SYFY is playing the clip where Zoidberg is showing Fry the camera that goes in him, and Fry opens his mouth, then Zoidberg says “Guess again!” and Fry’s expression changes to one of slight panic...

Actually, it’s you that’s not making sense, and you’re dodging the issue at hand.

Then let’s take your argument and cut to the chase; make the national minimum wage $50/hour or thereabouts. You’ve now brought everyone up out of poverty.

That is nowhere near a straw man argument, because I’m speaking about the person in the interview, which is working from home and can do that from anywhere; you’re arguing a different point about paying people that work in the office an amount tied to the office location.

So you’re supporting tying the pay amount to where you live...not for the job that being performed.

The job the guy in the interview has can be done from anywhere - he does NOT have to live in an expensive city.

The guy works from home; that can be done ANYWHERE. In the area I live in, the amount of money he earns is enough for a comfortable living.

You are blinded to the economics of this situation due to your intense jealousy of Bezos’ success and wealth. Wealth is not a finite resource and it can be created (just like Bezos did and all the other people who have became wealthy over the past few decades).

Which would be..?

Oh man; that was perfect - thanks for dropping that video (I may steal it for future use).

Dude...you’re trying to rationally discuss something with an insane, professional victim (Mwatuangi).

Charity, or, in this case, taxpayer-funded legislative aid, should perhaps begin at home.

Show me on the doll where the EBT joke hurt you.

I’m flattered, but married, so...you’ll have to move on to someone else.