I’ll call it what it’s been called for centuries; your definition to help you feel better about gay marriage is your dumbass definition.

I highly encourage any of you leftist shitbags to not eat at Chick-Fil-A any more. The lines will be shorter for me and the remaining sane, tolerant people, and I 1000% guarantee you that Chick-Fil-A DOESN’T need your effing money to thrive.

I can choose to not support gay marriage, just like gays can choose to not support traditional marriage; is that a hard concept to understand?

Agreed; the hate that the “tolerant” left throws towards Chick-Fil-A for supporting traditional marriage is effing stupid.

albo; these people are shitbags - don’t try to “discuss” this with them. They do not have the intellectual capacity to tolerate a different viewpoint. The whole “dead kid” argument is bullshit - they’re trying to stretch this topic to say that “If you eat at Chick-Fil-A then kids will kill themselves and you…

Okay, so if you and I were engaged in an argument, and you pushed me, or slapped me, or spit in my eye, you’re cool with me going over to your car and smashing in the windshield, and/or slashing all four of your tires...and then not being held accountable for that in any way. In fact, you would argue with the police…

“Somehow”? You missed the crime she admitted to?

If everyone seeking an exemption gets one, there’s no way the fee will raise the required revenue. 

which is definitely, certainly, not even debatably warming up

The point of my post was to show that, per the title of this blog, the speeds and lap times of an F1 car completely annihilate an IndyCar. The title wasn’t “Here’s how IndyCar speeds and lap times compared to F1 at the Circuit of the Americas, but keep in mind that IndyCar has totally different tires and aero and a…

As someone who holds two hardcore science degrees (not fluff degrees like Sociology or Economics or similar degrees that you “fail down to” at my school), I actually respect science (Climate Change Alarmists are not following the scientific method to arrive at their conclusions). The climate change dialogue has been…

I don’t see how posting a picture of the left’s reaction to the Mueller report is relevant to this discussion.

Eh, I can type pretty freaking fast if I remove my foil hat first!

Ignoring that you aimed that at me, you are actually correct, in a sense. Even under the same Gawker family, there are “other stations” that Alanis King could permanently move to and write for. If she’s so damned concerned about climate change that she feels the need to wedge it into a story about a HELLCAT (FFS),…

What part of my post said anything about denying climate change?

No, not really; just fully correct in this matter; Jalopnik is slowly being eroded by leftist, socialist garbage. Do you remember what it was like 5+ years ago? Do you honestly think that people need to be lectured about climate change in an article about a damn Hellcat?

I don’t see the relevance of posting the reaction that Democrats had to the 2016 Presidential election..?

“Snowflakes” are leftists who create “safe spaces”. As a conservative, let me say that those creations are all yours, you useless progressive.

So are you going to write in to Jalopnik and chastise them for writing this article about the evil gas-guzzling Hellcat? Are you going to insist that they only write articles about electric cars that are charged SOLELY by wind/hydro/solar/nuclear to ensure they are zero emissions?

whether the Earth’s climate is going up in flames around us or not.