createaburnekoaccount
CreateABurnekoAccount
createaburnekoaccount

holy fuck lol

So Kaepernick’s representation was able to “find suitors” because he leaked his desire to be traded to the press.

I’m not the one who backtracked babe ;)

show me my outrage champ. Thanks ;)

if you have to create a “target audience” for a conversation... then I’m pretty confident you don’t know what a conversation is. ;)

if that’s your point, then you A) aren’t very good and making it... and B) didn’t actually come close to making that point. Don’t shift the goalposts.

Mrs. Met is married. Who proposed to her? Why did she accept? What does this mean for her and Mr. Met?

“there was some good work being done by women at the time, as there continues to be”

I appreciate that you keep trying to sound intellectual. I really do. I just never stated that he breached his contract or was in the process of breaching it. So maybe put the dictionary away for a bit and quit arguing shit that no one said. K? K.

Any person speaking at an event covered by the media should be aware their remarks are no longer private and therefore open to public criticism.

I don’t disagree with any of that. Totally on board... but I lose a lot of sympathy since it’s an event he was asked (and probably paid) to speak at. They asked him a question and he answered... and it gave an honest answer. It’s amazing he’s being called a liar on here, yet if he had lied and gave the PC answer, it

if the argument is “she’s a great person because she does this out of purely good will”, then yes, it matters.

you can rest assured when someone starts with “This is a straw man argument.”, you’re about to get an actual straw man argument. Never fails! Keep doing God’s work Joe Dirt on Kinja.

I love when Kinja peeps who are clearly wrong come in to drop a couple words to sound more intellectual than they already are. You’re just missing an “obtuse” to get the Kinja trifecta!

You should probably get used to the idea that nothing that’s reported in the NFL media gets out unless it advances the purposes of the party who leaked it.

can you repeat that? I didn’t get it from the dozen other times you copy and pasted it ;)

didn’t want to see the Hogan one either... these guys would’ve saved about 140 mil had they listened to us!

I didn’t say he breached his contract... I said he wants to breach his contract.

“if they wanted to get rid of him”

Actually you’re wrong. The key in this is the term “gritty”, which in itself is a subjective word. What he considers gritty may be (and most likely is) much different than what you or I consider gritty. There is no quantifiable statistic for “grit”, so thus there is no quantifiable way to disprove him. There is no