How so? He didn't patent, copyright or even attempt to register his idea.

I bought the new BB on launch day.

Just because they have the money doesn't mean it's worth developing for an outdated platform that few people care about.

How is the majority of what Gizmodo "writes" on related to gadgets and gizmos? Unless it's how iPhone and Apple are awesome and can never fail, and Android is horrible and sucks and Google is terible (left out the R in terrible to emphasize Gizmodo's lack of basic English in most articles.)

Apparently Kryton doesn't know how to end a question. Shame. Not a big fan of the U.K. myself (boring!), but if your kind weren't so preoccupied with getting the biggest gun and racking up the highest number, you'd know what a question mark is.

In regards to #15, so?

Not that I'm defending Gizmodo and their horrendously written articles, but you understand that Giz didn't call Wikileaks a piracy site, right? Nor was it implied in the article you apparently didn't read yet commented on.

It's Gizmodo. I'm surprised they manage to spell "the" without the aid of a spellchecker.

America.

What are you hiding? You can tell us. *hides FBI mug*

Yes.

I understood it just fine.

If the Giz staff weren't so stupid, they could be doctors based on the penmanship alone.

Agreed.

Shame they're fake, they really Brighton'ed up my day.

While what Baumgartner did is pretty awesome, I fail to see how he's a "tech hero" for it. He "assembled a team that could build the technology he needed". Might want to rethink your grasp of the English language and what words mean.

Lol, I thought it was a Casey Chan or Kyle Id—Wagner article with the way it was typed.

Y u mad bro? That's one of the most incomprehensible comments I've seen on Gizmodo, and that's a lot considering most of their articles are horribly written.

a