Well, this sure is a dumb fucking take. The education they deserve... yes, they were not on their best behavior while being “taught” by a perverted loon, therefore they somehow deserve to get a shitty education from a perverted loon. Brilliant.

Well this.... definitely isnt true. Cut out everything queer history related? Wut? They still regularly discuss Stonewall, various past gay icons, the AIDS epidemic, etc etc, and they still have very frequent conversations about the struggles of growing up homosexual. If anything, they talk about those things MORE…

This is legitimately one of the most bizarrely awful articles i have ever read on here. First of all, why are you acting like having a cat on a leash is a problem at all, let alone debating whether it could ever be a violation worthy of flipping out over? It’s a conplete non-issue, and you act as if it is somehow…

Every part i have seen has been incredibly stupid, on top of it starring a shitty right wing lunatic.

I mean... they literally just described every single thing that happens. Which makes this one of the most pointless and redundant questions of all time.

Is this actually a real question? In order for this to be sincere, you have to be completely 100% unfamiliar with WWE and their past.

This article made me dislike Joan Summers. Your attempts at criticism and shade fall on the Utica Roast spectrum of being needlessly mean and vitriolic. Also, how the hell does someone not like Alaska?

“She wants to be left the fuck alone. The only way she can live her life is if they get off her back.”

It very much seems to me that YOU dont know the actual details of the case, considering much of what you said is false. I think you really need to do some research or watch the documentary, so you at least actually know what youre talking about the next time you comment about it.

Sure, except for the part where she explicitly stated that some were well-known actors. Actually reading the article is a good idea sometimes.

This is a very bad take. That era of SNL is ridiculously influential for a reason. You not liking it doesnt magically make it bad or overrated.

I was thinking as i read the review that the vast majority of people are (sadly) not going to have any idea what Mario Bava’s “Black Sunday” even is. I think you just confirmed as much...

I agree with many of his broader points, but his arguments/claims about heroin addicition and withdrawal (and the methodology he used to arrive there) are so woefully inaccurate and irresponsible as to be absurd. Using for a few days, and never intravenously, does not give an accurate understanding, let alone make one…