That’s the official video? My dog could edit together a video better than that. And who reads out the specs of a car??? That crap gets ten seconds of static text at most, or in the description of the video. It’s like these people have never seen really common things, like press videos, or a basic presentation on…

Don’t forget the “two symmetrical turbos. Twin turbos. Both turbos are symmetrical... The turbos are opposite of each other; mirror-image turbos in the car”

They didn’t say anything about staying on the ground, just that it would reach 290. In fact, it’ll go much faster when we give it what it deserves by strapping it to a rocket and SHOOTING IT INTO THE SUN!!!

If this is the future of Hypercars, I think I might turn in my Jalop card. I like the current round of hypercars; they’re very pretty and they don’t need tearing up. I’m perfectly alright waiting four or five years for the Veyron successor to duke it out with Koenigsegg’s Agera followup. And maybe even the SSC…

It looks even worse than that. Like a blind toddler tried to draw a Veyron, then fell asleep in the middle of it, then drooled on the whole thing to smudge it up. I can’t overstate how awful this thing looks

I still have no idea what he was saying with the cable nonsense. Even the system in my head, a single fiber-optic cable that runs back and forth through every component (which is what it sounds like he’s saying) would be really annoying to implement, painful to repair, and likely heavier because each and every…

Inferring from frame two, I’d say RoboCap. Gettit?

I think that’s the joke; it’s supposed to be a blower, but it ‘sucks,’ per the title.

I see the term “drive it like you rented it” has been proven once again! Am I the only one who’s surprised at how low the top speed of these cars is? Or is that just how the gearing has to be to get max mpgs at 60mph? If something as flat-faced and torque-geared as a Jeep Wrangler has a ~100 mph v-max, surely the…

Which, all things considered (this being an Adam Sandler movie, after all) is highly unlikely.

They have to stick to brand image. They're not going to redesign their entire styling language just for one new car. I don't see what people have against Mclaren's styling; it looks the right amount of sporty, aggressive, and sleek, while being instantly recognizable. What more could you ask?

Different for Mclaren, anyways. Ferrari and Ford have also done/are also doing the buttress thing. Still, it looks great!

That is so perfect!! Don't forget the WindGod:Ratio (Koenigsegg One:1), BMADW (Brown, manual, AWD, diesel Wagon), NY-6 Bounty (MX-5 Miata), and many others.

Even with the Flying Spur influence, I still think that C-pillar looks entirely too thick. Looking at comparable German cars (Ford isn't selling this for Bentley money, right?), like the A8 or 7-series, that have skinny C-pillars really draws attention to it:

Meaning, I assume, that they'll sell five, and from this unflattering angle it looks like a blimp? I hope this will be slimmed down in the finished model, especially that huge C-pillar. Just the side profile in general feels a little bulbous to me

I'm pretty sure that's just for stalk selectors, where you can catch reverse instead of drive if the layout is different than mandated. I don't think button selectors are regulated like that

That it most certainly is :)

Wait... The GT has a central exhaust; could you even put a trailer hitch on it? That said, Love the matching racing stripes

I think the problem with writing dialogue for multiplayer is that your character is very flat. You can't get good, fleshed out dialogue without good, fleshed out characters on both ends of the conversation, and I feel that Lester's dialogue in the SP heists, where both characters are fleshed out and there's some…